Orange County NC Website
WAIS Document Retrieval <br />hybrid hearing procedures with respect to " any matter which the <br />Commission determines to be in controversy among the parties. 11 <br />The hybrid procedures in section 134 provide for oral argument on <br />matters in controversy, preceded by discovery under the Commission's <br />rules and the designation, following argument of only those factual <br />issues that involve a genuine and substantial dispute, together with <br />any remaining questions of law, to be resolved in an adjudicatory <br />hearing. Actual adjudicatory hearings are to be held on only those <br />issues found to meet the criteria of section 134 and set for hearing <br />after oral argument. <br />The Commission's rules implementing section 134 of the NWPA are <br />found in 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart K, ''Hybrid Hearing Procedures for <br />Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Capacity at Civilian Nuclear Power <br />Reactors'' (published at 50 FR 41662 dated October 15, 1985). Under <br />those rules, any party to the proceeding may invoke the hybrid hearing <br />procedures by filing with the presiding officer a written request for <br />oral argument under 10 CFR 2.1109. To be timely, the request must be <br />filed within ten (10) days of an order granting a request for hearing <br />or petition to intervene. The presiding officer must grant a timely <br />request for oral argument. The presiding officer may grant an untimely <br />request for oral argument only upon a showing of good cause by the <br />requesting party for the failure to file on time and after providing <br />the other parties an opportunity to respond to the untimely request. If <br />the presiding officer grants a request for oral argument, any hearing <br />held on the application must be conducted in accordance with the hybrid <br />hearing procedures. In essence, those procedures limit the time <br />available for discovery and require that an oral argument be held to <br />determine whether any contentions must be resolved in an adjudicatory <br />hearing. If no party to the proceeding timely requests oral argument, <br />and if all untimely requests for oral argument are denied, then the <br />usual procedures in 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart G apply. <br />For further details with respect to this action, see the <br />application for amendment dated December 23, 1998, which is available <br />for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the <br />Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local <br />public document room located at the Cameron Village Regional Library, <br />1930 Clark Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605. <br />Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of January 1999. <br />For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. <br />Scott Flanders, <br />Project Manager, Project Directorate II -3, Division of Reactor <br />Projects- -I /II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. <br />[FR Doc. 99 -758 Filed 1- 12 -99; 8:45 am] <br />BILLING CODE 7590 -01 -P <br />Page 8 of 8 <br />http: / /frwebgate2. acces ... /waisgate.cgi ?WAISdocID= 341284846 +0 +0 +0 &WAISaction = retriev 1/14/99 <br />