Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Issue: Transition Area Definitions with.respect to T -I and T -II <br />Alternatives Pro Con <br />1. maintain distinction tends to prevent <br />between T -I and T -II leapfrogging <br />Source - citizen <br />comments <br />2. Eliminate distinction <br />between T -I and T -II <br />(eliminates density <br />max now in T -II) <br />Source - Facilitated <br />Small Area Plan for <br />Carrboro's Northern <br />Study Area <br />3. maintain distinction <br />between T -I and T -II <br />but make methodology <br />for determining when <br />to eliminate T -II <br />density max more <br />workable <br />Source - citizen <br />comments and <br />Commissioner <br />Jacobs <br />definition work- <br />ability problem <br />gone; no pressure <br />to build -out T -I; <br />distinction between <br />T -I and T -II not <br />consistent with new <br />Land Use Plan <br />definition work- <br />ability problem <br />gone; tends to <br />prevent leap- <br />frogging; provides <br />vehicle for float- <br />ing zone process <br />compromise (who <br />approves where) <br />workability; may be <br />encouraging suburban <br />sprawl to achieve <br />T -I build -out; may <br />hinder new Land Use <br />Plan implementation <br />may encourage sub- <br />urban sprawl into <br />T -II <br />distinction between <br />T -I and T -II not con- <br />sistent with new Land <br />Use Plan and Map; may <br />encourage suburban <br />sprawl to achieve T -I <br />build -out <br />Action needed <br />and Timeliness <br />(Ripe for Action <br />or not Ripe for <br />Action <br />done (present <br />condition) <br />Amend Joint <br />Planning Agree- <br />ment and Joint <br />Planning Land <br />Use Plan and <br />Map; <br />Has been to <br />public hearing; <br />Ripe for action <br />Amend Joint <br />Planning Agree- <br />ment and Joint <br />Land Use Plan; <br />Has not been to <br />public hearing; <br />not Ripe for <br />action <br />M <br />