Browse
Search
Minutes - 19770215
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1977
>
Minutes - 19770215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 11:59:53 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:21:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/15/1977
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M5 <br />The Chairman recognized Lucius Cheshire, spokesman for the Orange <br />Committee. Mr. Cheshire stated that for an increasing period of time, <br />the question had arisen in both South and North Orange County relative <br />to persons being allowed to vote in Orange County's elections and pri- <br />maries, who were not under the laws of North Catalina entitled to vote <br />in our elections a.s xegistered voters or residents of Orange Gounty. <br />xe stated that the problem is one the Orange Committee is concerned <br />with and certain inquires had been made into the situation. <br />Mr. Cheshire cited the case of Ha11 VS Wake County, 280 NC 600 (1972) <br />of the North Carolina Supremem Court which set forth certain legal prin- <br />ciples which apply to the question of whether or not a student should be <br />allowed to vote in the county where the school is located. Mr. Cheshire <br />read Justice S~arpe's opinion. "Tf a student goes to a college town <br />merely as a student, intending to remain there only until his education <br />is completed, he does not acquire a domicile there. The Court further <br />stated that there is a presumption that a student who leaves his parent's <br />home to enter college is not domiciled in the college town to which he <br />goes. This, the Court said, is an inference of fact based on probabil- <br />ities and the common experience of mankind; at birth, a person takes the <br />domicile of the person upon whom he is legally dependent; a domicile once <br />acquired is presumed to continue, it is never lost until a new one is <br />established and the burden of proof rest upon the person who alleges a <br />change." <br />Mr. Cheshire stated, "in spite of these legal principles, the <br />persons responsible for enforcing the election laws i.n Orange County <br />have allowed students from. outside Orange County to register and vote <br />wholesale. In the November, 1976 election, 528 voted in Country Club <br />precinct in Chapel Hill. This was only 164 less votes than were cast <br />by the entire Hillsborough precinct. Of this total, Country Club pre- <br />cinct's vote of 528, only 132 were dormitories students and gave their <br />addresses as such at the time they registered. Of the almost 400 <br />students who were allowed to register and vote as 'residents' of <br />Orange County only 21 listed any property for tax purposes in Orange <br />County, through the listing month of January 1976, and none of them <br />listed any real property for taxation." <br />Mr. Cheshire continued, "the bona fide residents of Orange County <br />have been deprived of their right to a voice in the selection of their <br />government by virtue of the saturation of our registration bocks by <br />non-residents. We believe that the State Board of Elections should <br />require the Orange County Board of Electicns to purge our registration <br />books of all persons who have not established their residence in accord- <br />ance with the law as stated by the North Carolina Supreme Court or to <br />remove from office the Orange County Board of Elections for their failure <br />to do so." <br />Mr..Cheshire stated that the Orange Committee was present to re- <br />quest the Orange County Commissioners to express their sentiments. "That <br />you agree with us, that the books should be purged of these who are not <br />qualified under the laws of North Carolina to the right to register and <br />vote in Orange County. We ask you to express yourselves in that respect <br />in agreeing with our proposition that the election laws of North Carolina <br />should be followed in that respect." <br />The Chairman of the Board recognized S. Thomas Hollands, Chairman <br />of the Orange County Board of Elections. Mr. Hollins stated that every <br />registered voter in Orange County had the right to challenge another <br />voter, as to whether he has the right to vote. He added that if those <br />persons felt that students did not have the right to vote, those persons <br />_ had the right to challenge that vote. He stated that the Board of Elec- <br />tions did not know how many physicians, farmers, or plumbers were regist- <br />ered, or how many students were registered. That in the Committ-e's <br />examination of the precinct, it was evident that a precinct was chosen <br />with the most students. "If a precinct was chosen from Northern Orange, <br />you probably would not have found one student." <br />Chairman Whitted asked Mr. Hollands if any irregularities were <br />pointed out to the Board of Elections would steps be taken toward <br />corrective action. Mr. Hollands replied, "certainly." <br />Chairman whitted stated that .this Board had been requested to adopt <br />a resolution to support the upholding of the election laws of the State <br />of North Carolina. <br />Commissioner Walker stated, "I would so move." Commissioner Pinney <br />seconded the motion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.