Agenda - 02-02-1999 - 10e - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

stressed that additional tax dollars should not be used to fund this position, instead being supported by existing funds. Support for a program matching existing farmers with those interested in beginning an operation was also expressed. Forty percent (40%) of those surveyed agreed that they would be interested in supporting such a "Farm Link" or "Farm Finder" program. Some respondents expressed particular interest, citing their own desire to learn how to expand their operations and learn new aspects of the trade. Some were hesitant, expressing the need to make sure that new farmers were genuinely interested in the venture while understanding the difficulties of farming today. While a majority of respondents stated that Conservation Easements, Purchase of Development Rights, and Transfer of Development Rights were not for them, many also responded that they needed more information before making a decision. Thirty-five to forty percent (35-40%) of respondents wanted more information regarding these programs, while a similar percentage did not express support. Between 15 and 20% of farmers support preservation programs such as these. Some citizens said they felt programs such as these were important in retaining open space and wildlife habitats, while those opposing easements, PDRs and TDRs, did not want to donate or sell development rights on any part of their land, instead leaving it unencumbered for future generations. Genera! Comments Survey respondents were invited to express their concerns in the comment section following the survey questions. A large number of respondents provided remarks that displayed many heartfelt opinions of their experiences here in Orange County. Concerns covered topics such as low commodity prices, the dominance of Chapel Hill in county affairs, lack of agricultural facilities, and regulatory hardships. Farmers were very open about the problems facing their operations, as well as their dreams of maintaining a successful business for their children and grandchildren. Many farmers expressed frustration at land use restrictions in Orange County, particularly watershed regulations. Because Orange County watershed regulations are stricter than the state mandated rules, farmers feel they are bearing an undue burden. As a result, many have decided to move operations outside of the County. Residential development is also causing some farmers to relocate to neighboring counties. Farmers are noticing the increases in development near their land, and lament the problems that usually follow this trend. The influx of new residents into traditional agricultural areas has lead to increases in complaints about their operations. The influence of Chapel Hill is also a concern for many farmers in the rural quarters of Orange County. Many feel that the concerns of Chapel Hillians often dominate the policies of the County due to greater political representation. With most of the County's population located in the Chapel Hill township, many farmers feel that policies are decided upon by those living in the southeastern corner of the County. Farmers feel under-represented in crafting policies ultimately affecting the mostly rural northern sections of the County. Taxes are also a large concern for farmers. Most farmers' land is in the Present Use program with large tax breaks for agricultural land. However, the land under their houses and their 1998 Orange County Agricultural Survey