Orange County NC Website
5 <br />In addition to adoption of the Economic Development Strategic Plan, the Board of County <br />Commissioners adopted a Farmland Preservation Goal for fiscal year 1997-98 which stated: <br />"Conduct survey of the farm community. Incorporate results into the cooperative ADAB/EDC <br />effort to address strategies to preserve economic viability of Orange County agriculture." <br />The 1998 Agricultural Survey, Keeping Farmers Farming:A Survey of the Challenges Facing <br />Orange County Farmers, is the product of these initiatives. <br />Development of the Survey Instrument <br />The survey instrument was developed during Spring 1996 by Alexandra Elias, a graduate student <br />from the Department of City and Regional Planning of the University of North Carolina at <br />Chapel Hill. During a `pilot' survey to a selected group of agriculturists with previous <br />involvement in County advisory boards and committees, several obstacles to completing a <br />successful survey were identified. <br />The issues of concern were confidentiality of responses and the intended purpose of the survey. <br />These obstacles were indicative of uneasiness. among the farm community about County land use <br />regulations and policies. There was also a considerable degree of mistrust from farmers about <br />providing potentially sensitive information to a County agency. Several pilot survey respondents <br />cited an unfortunate instance that occurred in the late 1980s as a source of this apprehension. A <br />survey on irrigation practices, conducted by another County agency on behalf of the State, had <br />garnered a high rate of response. However, approximately a year later, there was a proposal by <br />the Town of Hillsborough to regulate the amount of water farmers had been pumping from their <br />ponds. When the survey was cited as evidence of the need for new regulations, farmers were <br />outraged. This situation severely damaged the credibility of the County among a group of <br />citizens who are traditionally wary of government. The sensitivity of this issue a decade later <br />demonstrated the need for the ADAB to be forthright in its communications with the farming <br />community about the 1998 survey. <br />The survey was refined by the Agricultural Districts Advisory Board and the Planning <br />Department staff during the next several months to address the concerns raised during the pilot <br />survey. The original Elias survey was condensed for both ease of response and to focus the <br />questions on respondents' attitudes toward the changes to agriculture rendered by the rapid <br />growth of the County. The final version of the survey is provided as Appendix A. <br />Survey Sponsorship and Distribution <br />The ADAB decided to find anagriculture-related entity to sponsor the survey to enhance its <br />credibility and foster a greater rate of response. In December 1997, a proposal was made to the <br />Orange Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors to endorse and sponsor the <br />agricultural survey. In January 1998, the District Board of Supervisors agreed to endorse the <br />survey. The survey cover letter, signed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, is provided <br />as Appendix D. <br />A mailing list provided by the Orange County Cooperative Extension Service was utilized for <br />distribution of the survey. The sample included all known producers of agricultural products in <br />Orange County. Size of operation was not a factor in developing the list; thus, the sample <br />included one-person beekeeping or vegetable farm operations, as well as the largest dairy, beef, <br />1998 Orange County Agricultural Survey <br />