Orange County NC Website
z~ <br />Commissioner Pinney proceeded to review some of the questions he <br />had with the Contracts. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he had questions, which he read to <br />the Board concerning the qualifications and background of a chosen <br />consultant. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated that the Board had spent aver 18 <br />months in discussion of qualifications of the architect and he felt that <br />a very thoa^ough review of the architect had been made. <br />Further discussion ensued. The Chairman stated that the-Board <br />had decided at their last meeting to engage Mr. Nassif as the architect <br />for design of the Grady Brown School building pending the County Attorney's <br />review of the Contracts. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson suggested that Mr. Pinney and those with <br />questions meet with Mre Nassif and the County Attorney to review the <br />Contract. The Chairman requested Commissioner Pinney to arrange the <br />meeting with the County Attorney and Mr. Nassif and that other Board <br />members be informed of the time of the meeting. <br />The chairman referred to Item 12: Wi11 the Board of Commissioners <br />authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with Joseph Nassif, AIA, <br />for architectural work necessary to renovate the Orange County Jail. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the Chairman be authorized to <br />sign the AIA Contract with Mr. Nassif for architectural work to renovate <br />the Orange County Jail, after Mr. Pinney, the County Attorney, and Mr. <br />Nassif have reviewed the documents. <br />He added that should there be any questions concerning the contract <br />that the document should be brought back to the Board. <br />Commissioner Pinney seconded the motion. The Chairman called for <br />the vote. Voting aye were Commissioners Gustaveson, Pinney, Whitted and <br />Willhoit. Voting nay was Commissioner Walker. <br />The Chairman declared the motion passed. <br />Item 13: The Finance Director will review a proposed budget amend- <br />ment. The County Manager recommends adoption of these amendments. <br />The agenda attachment stated that the proposed budget amendment in- <br />cludes the establishment of two new funds as well as numerous changes <br />in the General Fund. <br />The. two new funds account for the School Bond money and the Section <br />Eight Program. <br />Tn the General Fund, the nichol on the bottle money and the Sheriff's <br />Special Account axe appropriated per the frequest request of Commissioners. <br />The School Capital Outlay appropriation, replaced by Bond Funds, is <br />moving to the General County Building Account. Three amounts, one for <br />Courts-Equipment, one for Motor Pool Supplies, and one for Miscellaneous <br />Community Development, were erroneously not appropriated and need to be <br />added to the budget. One, the Community Aevelopment Project has a revenue <br />source, not yet received; the Courts-Equipment for Courtroom Furniture <br />was appropriated in the previous year, but not encumbered and consequently <br />should come from unappropriated Fund Balance; and the Motor Pool-Supplies <br />for auto stickers was never appropriated and it is suggested that this <br />come from Contingency. One additional sum is required to balance the <br />Miscellaneous-Street Surfacing Account. $2,367 is the total cost of the <br />first project and it is recommended that this come from Street Assessment. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the budget amendment be adopted. <br />The motion was seconded by Commissioner Whitted. The Chairman called for <br />the vote. Voting aye were Commissioners Gustaveson, Whitted, Willhoit <br />and Walker. Voting nay was Commissioner Pinney. The motion was declared <br />passed. <br />For copy of 1976-1977 Budget Ordinance Amendment see page 32 of this <br />book. <br />i <br />