Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1999 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-16-1999
>
Agenda - 02-16-1999 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 10:28:50 AM
Creation date
7/15/2009 8:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Board of County Commissioners <br />Z -04 -98 Agenda Abstract . <br />M <br />businesses like motels and restaurants and suggested that more area close <br />to the interchange be excluded from the EDD. <br />The County Engineer has verified that there are no specific plans at this <br />time for the construction or provision of water or sewer utilities to the EDD <br />and that such an extension is not likely to take place without the certainty <br />that some business enterprise(s) is /are going to locate in the EDD. He <br />commented that it is not clear, at this time, which utility provider would be <br />extending utilities to the area or how the costs of such an extension would <br />be paid. <br />The Orange County Sheriff's Department commented that the Sheriffs <br />Department presently provides patrol services to the area and that office <br />sees no need for an increase in personnel or equipment to continue that <br />service (if the property is rezoned). <br />On November 12, 1998, the Economic Development Commission voted <br />unanimously to recommend that the rezoning be denied. Members <br />expressed concern that allowing further residential development in the EDD <br />would erode the integrity of the area making it less desirable for industrial <br />and commercial development. One of the location criteria used in selecting <br />the expanded area was that there were relatively few residences within the <br />area (17 within the 586 acres). That commission also noted that it supports <br />extending utilities to the Buckhorn EDD to attract light industrial and <br />commercial development. <br />Public Hearing Summary <br />A joint public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and the <br />Planning Board was held on November 23, 1998. The applicants did not <br />appear to address their request. Mabel Allison, owner of property adjacent <br />to the subject property to the east and north, testified that she and her <br />husband oppose the proposed rezoning and increased residential <br />development in the 1- 85 /Buckhorn EDD. <br />Recommendation of the Orange County Planning Board <br />On January 6, 1999, the Orange County Planning Board reviewed the <br />application and voted to recommend denial of the Special Use Permit <br />application based on the following findings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.