Orange County NC Website
18 <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />DECEMBER 14, 1976 <br />The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in special session on <br />Tuesday, December 14, 1976, at 7:30 p.m., in the Commissioners' Room of <br />the Courthouse in Hillsborough. <br />Members present were Chairman Richard Whitted, Commissioners Norman <br />Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker, and Donald Willhoit. <br />Others present were S. M. Gattis, County Administrator, Neal Evans, <br />Finance Director, Ervin Dobson, Planning Director, Hal Minis, Chris <br />Edwards, and Kathy Hoffer of the Planning Staff, Jean Anderson of the <br />Orange County Planning Board, and Agatha Johnson, Clerk. <br />Chairman Whitted stated that the first order of business for the <br />Board was to discuss insurance overage for the County awned buildings. <br />The County Manager presented to the Board a list showing the build- <br />ings owned by the County, the actual cost value and the replacement cost <br />of these buildings. He informed the Board that the insurance coverage <br />an these buildings had expired and that presently coverage was through <br />a binder. He added that the fiscal property had doubled and the premium <br />would be greater than before. The Board needs to decide what type of <br />coverage the County should have, coverage of the actual cost value ar <br />the replacement cost value. <br />Chairman Whitted stated that the policy would be a blanket policy <br />and the rate ®ould be between seven and ten cents per one hundred dollar <br />evaluation of the buildings. <br />Discussion ensued. Commissioner Pinney stated that he felt the <br />buildings should be insured for the maximum figure and recommended that <br />the buildings be insured for the replacement cost. <br />The consensus of the Board was to insure all County owned buildings <br />at the replacement cost value. The County Manager was authorized to <br />proceed with securing the needed insurance coverage. <br />The Chairman stated that the Board had met tonight, to talk with <br />the Planning Staff to set priorities and schedules for the Planning <br />Staff. He then turned the meeting over to the Planning Director, Erwin <br />pobson. Mr. Dobson stated that he would like to bring the Board up--to- <br />date as to where the Planning Staff is at this point and to learn where <br />the Plann~.ng Department should go from here. Mr. Dobson asked Hal Minis <br />to inform the Board as to where the Planning Staff is regarding mapping <br />data. Mr. Minis showed to the Board maps of soil suitability far Bingham, <br />Chapel. Hill, and Cheeks Townships. The next map viewed was a map of <br />septic tank suitability. Mr. Minis stated that these two maps would be <br />used together in the development of subdivisions and developments. He <br />stated that the Planning Department had received from Triangle J, a computer <br />printout of prime agriculture soils. He added that maps would be ready by <br />the end of the month for public utilities, facilities, and land use for <br />Bingham, Cheeks, and Hillsborough Townships. Land Use maps have been com- <br />pleted for all townships. <br />Kathy Hoffer spoke of the development trends in the County's unplan- <br />ned townships. She stated that some development was going on in all of <br />the unplanned townships. She added that Bingham Township presently had <br />three known subdivisions underway, and that lots sizes ranged from five <br />to twenty .acres in size. Chris Edwards stated that development taking <br />place in the University watershed was basically two acre lots. He <br />stated that the trend to the west of Chapel Hi11 is for larger lots. Mx. <br />Edwards stated that plats had to be recorded if the plat involved a new <br />road or a change in an existing road. He added that there were two new <br />roads, of any size, in Bingham Township. <br />The Planning Director asked Ms. Hoffer to report on the progress of <br />the Sign Enforcement Program. Ms. Hoffer stated that 40 letters were sent <br />out concerning signs on I-85, Old Highway 86 and new Highway 86. The sign <br />