Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1999 - 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-16-1999
>
Agenda - 02-16-1999 - 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 4:27:42 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 4:27:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990216
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
02i16i99 09:45 HARMON+CURRAN+SPI -~ 919 644 0246 N0.093 D07 <br />_6. <br />According to the Federal Register notice, the only kind of accident that might <br />conceivably be considered new is the accidental drop of a fuel rack; but that accident was already <br />considered in relation to pool B. 64 Fed. Reg. at 2?39. Thus, the Staff concludes that the <br />proposed license amendment would not create the possibility of a new or different kind of <br />accident from any accident previously evaluated. As discussed in Section J of the Thompson <br />Declaration, this conclusion is incorrect, for several reasons. <br />First, it does not appear that there has been any site-specific evaluation of the probability <br />or consequences of severe accidents at pools A and B at Harris. The NRC has performed <br />evaluations of accidents involving loss of water from fuel pools, generically and for sites other <br />than Hams. However, these evaluations aze seriously deficient because they failed to consider <br />partial uncovering of fuel. See Thompson Declaration, Sections G and H. Thus, at pools A and <br />B there exists the possibility of new or different kinds of accident from any accident previously <br />evaluated. The same possibility will exist at pools C and D if these are activated. Severe <br />accidents at some or all of the Harris pools could lead to offsite radiation exposure an order of <br />magnitude Larger than the exposure from the Chernobyl accident. <br />Second, the addition of pools C and D to the Unit 1 cooling system creates the possibility <br />of a new accident that was not previously considered. As Dr. Thompson poinu out, the IPE and <br />IPEEE studies performed for Harris did not address the provision of backup electrical power and <br />CCW service to pools C and D. As Dr. Thompson points out, the need to provide cooling to <br />pools C and D will place increased stress on the CCW system and backup diesel generators as <br />well as the plant operators during a design basis loss of coolant accident ("LGCA'~, thereby <br />creating the possibility of a new accident. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.