Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 10
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 11:15:01 AM
Creation date
7/14/2009 3:57:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment 10
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990218
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CON <br />- Capital requirements may compete with other municipal bonding priorities <br />- Responsible for facility over long term (future equipment replacement, etc.) <br />- Public sector sometimes is less flexible and responsive to market changes <br />- Requires long term commitment to project as part of overall strategy <br />Approach E• Public Ownership Financing Design and Construction w/ Private Sector Operation Under <br />Contract <br />PRO <br />- Same as "D" above with: <br />- Larger pool of potential bidders for operating contract <br />- Can use shorter term contracts (5 years and less) <br />- More control over project on a year to year basis <br />- More opportunities to change contract to address shifts in market <br />- More control over revenues, tipping fees, costs and income <br />- Close match of your actual fees to real costs <br />CON <br />- Same as "D" above with: <br />- More month to month management responsibility and burden <br />- Vendor may not bring as strong a connection to markets <br />- May require more direct end - market commitments from public sector <br />Approach F• Public Ownership Financing Desion, and Construction w/local Community Based Operation <br />PRO <br />- Same as 'D" above with: <br />- Larger pool of potential bidders for operating contract <br />- Can use shorter term contracts (5 years and less) <br />- More control over project on a year to year basis <br />- More opportunities to change contract to address shifts in market <br />- More control over revenues, tipping fees, costs and income <br />- Close match of your actual fees to real costs <br />CON <br />- Same as 'D' above with: <br />- More month to month management responsibility and burden <br />- Vendor may not bring as strong a connection to markets <br />- May require more direct end - market commitments from public sector <br />Approach G• Public Ownership Financing Design, Construction and Operation <br />PRO <br />- Public financing of capital provides lower rates and longer term (20 years) <br />- Complete control over revenues, tipping fees, costs and income <br />- Close match of your actual fees to real costs <br />- Ability to get value added capabilities (e.g. education center) <br />- Ability to get optimum site location and integrate with other functions <br />2/5/99 Orange Regional MRF LOG Workshop Materials 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.