Orange County NC Website
V: ' Public/Private Partnership Model as Basis for MRF Development <br />The last key issue covered in this white paper is the basic "business" arrangement or "public/private <br />partnership" to be used for the MRF project which must be clearly identified prior to releasing the RFP. <br />This will define what kinds of companies are being targeted by the RFP, what kind of responses the RFP <br />is looking for and how those companies should price out their proposals to cover the risks that they are <br />being asked to bear. <br />THE RANGE OF OPTIONS FOR PUBLIC /PRIVATE MRF PROJECTS <br />Successful MRFs are operating today that represent a broad range of these public/private partnership <br />models. The following chart illustrates this spectrum. On the left side is the private sector dominant <br />model characterized by the "merchant facility". On the right side is the public sector dominant model <br />characterized by publicly owned and operated MRFs. In between are variations that represent a balance <br />between public and private sector interests unique to the varying circumstances of communities across <br />the country. <br />PRIVATE PUBLIC OWN/FINANCE PUBLIC OWN/FINANCE <br />"MERCHANT" PRIVATE PUBLIC DESIGN/BUILD <br />MRF DESIGN/BUILD /OPERATE PUBLIC OPERATION <br />"MERCHANT" MRF PUBLIC LAND PUBLIC OWN/FINANCE PUBLIC OWN/FINANCE <br />W/MAJOR HOSTING PUBLIC DESIGN/BUILD PUBLIC DESIGN/BUILD <br />PUBLIC CONTRACTS PRIVATE MRF PRIVATE OPERATION NON- PROFIT OPERATION <br />There are many variations off these basic alternatives. For example, a simple variation of the Public <br />Own/Finance and Private Design/Build/Operate Model is for the private sector to finance the equipment, <br />thus taking on the risk of short and long term maintenance, renewal and replacement of that equipment. <br />RECOMMENDED PUBLIC/PRIVATE MODEL <br />To date with the MRF Project, assessments have been completed of private and public sector capabilities, <br />strengths and weaknesses that impact what the best business arrangements are for a successful MRF to <br />serve the Orange County communities. There are a number of private sector firms that are capable of <br />and interested in partnering in development of recycling capacity to service the area. We expect a strong <br />response to any RFP that would be released for an Orange Regional MRF. The public sector also brings <br />significant strengths and capabilities to its side of the potential partnership. <br />Through effective use of the RFP process, the Approach D: Public Ownership and Financing with Private <br />Sector Design, Build and Operate becomes our recommended 'baseline" approach to the Orange <br />Regional MRF Project. Such an approach would allow the public side of this partnership to optimize <br />public/private strengths, accept risk for the public sector if it will lower costs and fees, accept risk for the <br />public sector if it provides valuable control, and accept risk for the public sector if it builds off public sector <br />strengths. <br />This recommended "baseline" approach to the Orange Regional MRF Project takes advantage of private <br />sector capabilities to design, build and operate a MRF, access recycling markets under all types of market <br />conditions, apply their knowledge and experience with technology, provide.their operational experience <br />and capabilities and use their flexibility in managing staff resources. Financing of equipment by the private <br />sector may also be desirable to consider. Such an approach also take advantage of the private firms <br />ability to attract regional tonnage, spread all costs across that tonnage and make some of those savings <br />available to the public sector -- if the public sector can approach the bidding process correctly. <br />2/5/99 Orange Regional MRF LOG Workshop Materials 15 <br />