Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 9
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 11:17:07 AM
Creation date
7/14/2009 3:54:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment 9
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990218
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,4#4-C, 4 W 944 ?L <br />To: Gavle Wilson <br />From: Edward Pollan <br />Date: June 29, 1998 <br />Re: C&D Tickets from May, 1998; and <br />Construction and Demolition Waste Survey <br />C &D Tickets from May.1998 <br />A preliminary review of the C&D deliveries for the month of May, 1998 show that there had been 2,089 <br />C&D deliveries to the IandfiIl during the calendar month, the majority of those coming fi+om smaller <br />loads. <br />Of 2,089 total C&D deliveries, 1,255 (60.1 %) were less than one -ton. <br />In terms of the munber of customers potentially impacted: 116 different landfill customers delivered C&D <br />waste to the landfill during the month and 80 (69.0%) has deliveries of 1-ton or less. - <br />The greatest number of small loads were received, not unexpectedly, from "Miscellaneous Cash <br />Customer" and "Orange County." . <br />Customer (Cast. fA <br />Total Loads <br />Less than 1 -ton <br />Nsc. Cash Customers (044) <br />908 <br />662 (72.9%) . <br />Orange County (107) ... . ,. <br />325 <br />286 (88.0 %) <br />Other landfill accounts that appear himly to deliver <br />smaller C&D loads include public agencies and <br />smaller non-profit organizations: <br />�.. <br />Customer (Cost. #1 <br />Total Loads <br />Less than 1 -ton <br />Town of Chapel Hill <br />62 <br />59 (95.2 %) <br />Cariboro <br />21 <br />12 (57.1%) <br />UNC and Hospital <br />42 <br />19 (452%) <br />CH- Carrboro YMCA <br />4 <br />4(1000/*) <br />PTA Thrift Shop <br />5 <br />4(80.0%) <br />It would appear that the absence of a "local" C&D disposal facility would most heavily impact customers <br />with smaller loads of C&D waste to dispose o4 as the additional cost and distance to transport that waste <br />to a distant facility would be most burdensome and add to their costs. of operations. <br />Construction and Demolition Waste Survev <br />A sun er of all in- coming loads of C&D waste was conducted at the landfill between Friday and Tuesday <br />(June 26* to 30'h), consisting of the questions and possible responses outlined below. The responses to <br />each question have been tabulated to show the raw number of each type of response and the percentage of <br />particular responses to each question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.