Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 8
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999
>
Agenda - 02-18-1999 - Attachment 8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 3:50:46 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 3:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/1999
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment 8
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990218
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town <br />of <br />Hills gh <br />TO: Landfill Owners Group Alternative Financing Committee <br />FROM: Town of Hillsborough Board of Commissioners <br />DATE: January 27, 1999 <br />SUBJECT: Comments on Solid WastelRccycling Funding Alternatives <br />~GC. ~x~ ~~o* <br />~/,$f9~ <br />The Hillsborough Hoard of Conuriissioners held a workshop on January 26'" to discuss arxi evaluate <br />the four proposed funding alternatives for solid waste and recycling operations in Orange County. <br />The Board approached this issue with the intent of commenting on conecptual funding philosophies <br />rather than trying to determine a precise mechanism to address this issue. Since there are an infinite <br />number of funding alternatives, each possessing irtherent inequities and administrative difficulties, <br />the Hillsborough Board attempted to focus its comments an the most practical and reasonably <br />equitable solutions available to address the cast of solid wastdrecycling operations. <br />The following is a summary of the Board's comments, concerns, and recommendations regarding <br />the four alternative financing mechanisms: <br />1. Reveenes Ex ln:iy ly rnm T p~pg,~; <br />This alternative may be the most equitable and easiest to administer and therefore was worthy of <br />evaluation. Unfortunately, the Board believes that exclusively increasing tipping fees to fluid <br />operations while the waste stream is being reducod through recycling would ultimately force haulers <br />to take their waste to rztore affordable disposal facilities, thus magtifying the problem of providing <br />a reliable revenue source. For these reasons the Hillsborough Board feels Alternative #1 is nQt a <br />viable financing mechanuism. <br />2. Ceuety-wride Prn~ty Tax <br />While there are some inequity problems associated with this method, the Hillsborough Board feels <br />this may be an acceptable source of alternate financing for solid waste/recycling operations. The <br />Hoazd feels that the availability of a MRF would benefit residents equally throughout Orange <br />County, thus justifying the taxation for a countywide plan. If a countywide tax is used, the Board <br />suggests Orange County provide a separate line on the tax bills to show/educate the citiiens they are <br />paying four (4) cents for Solid Waste Disposal/Recycling Operations in the county. Since there is <br />already apre-existing syste~on in place for property tax collection, administering this financing <br />mechanism would be one of the easier methods of collecting this revenue. <br />3_ s.-~tt~t~ittt.-,~ Fee <br />While there are some inequity problems associated with this method, the Hillsborough Board feels <br />this may be an acceptable source of alternate financung for solid waste/recycling operations. The <br />101 Eart Orange Stmt • P.O. Boat 4Z9 • Xillibororagh, North Catollnat 27298 <br />919-7~$-211N • Fax: 919-ef4s-at9ft <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.