Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-22-1999
>
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 4:42:03 PM
Creation date
7/13/2009 4:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990222
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Feb-19-99 01:58P Coleman Gledhill Hargrave 919 732 7997 P.05 <br />Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />Page 4 <br />February 19, 1999 <br />other counties transporting its residents. The Sheriff has <br />requested this legislative change presumably because Orange <br />County would receive more than it pays if this legislation is <br />adopted. <br />During the last session of the General Assembly, Orange <br />County attempted to get local authority to regulate burning <br />parallel to that authority given to cities. Counsel to the <br />legislative committee considering that bill worried about its <br />constitutionality because it relates to healtr~. Bills regulating <br />health cannot be local. Although I did not share, nor did the <br />County Commissioner Associations General Counsel share that <br />concern, it stopped the bill from moving. I think that a <br />Statewide bill granting this authority will at least assure a <br />"hearing' on this grant of authority. I recommend these matters <br />be presented for public hearing on March 3, 1999. <br />The next category of legislation includes those matters <br />which may be introduced either on a local or Statewide basis, <br />which I think the Board should support by resolution rather than <br />with its own bill. Zn each instance the item is likely to be a <br />part of legislation introduced on behalf of thc~ North Carolina <br />Association of County Commissioners, the Triangle Transit <br />Authority or some other group or jurisdiction more directly <br />involved with the issue. <br />1, An expanded menu of County revenue sources; <br />2, an increased State role in paying the cost of <br />Medicaid; <br />3. restoring growth in reimbursements for lost local <br />property tax revenue; <br />4. State funding for increased school utility costs; <br />5. local government exemption from State sales taxes; <br />6. increased court fees to provide counties with revenue <br />for court facilities; <br />~- <br />_ :. ~ ~- <br />C a <br />8. prevent tax base erosion that would occur from <br />property tax exemption for nonprofit retirement. facilities; <br />9. streamline design and bidding processes for new school <br />construction; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.