Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 02-22-1999
>
Agenda - 02-22-1999 - 1a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2015 11:24:54 AM
Creation date
7/13/2009 3:58:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/22/1999
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990222
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
100 <br />park. The large park would have volley ball, badminton, and horse shoes. People could walk to this park, bring their <br />children and dogs, and enjoy active recreation. There are storm water management ponds which are a primary . <br />feature of the plan. The ponds would be buffered by hedge and vegetation, which would help to screen them from <br />the adjacent residents. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for further clarification regarding the "pedestrian- friendly nature of this <br />development. <br />Mr. Murray stated that in his opinion there are three components that make a neighborhood pedestrian <br />friendly. Those are that the streets are interconnected so that you can walk down a street and not have to turn <br />around and go back the same way. You can cross through and go over another block. Sidewalks on both sides of <br />every street is another component. The minimum requirement is something less than the five -foot minimum, which <br />is being proposed. The final component is that you have to have destinations, such as parks or ball fields. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the proposed clearcutting and asked would it all be clear -cut or would <br />there be variations on the type of land clearing. <br />Mr. Murray explained that over + of the property is already open property. There is an old tree line that runs <br />through the property and that is proposed to be protected and maintained. He pointed to other areas where the tree <br />growth would be left. He pointed out an area where trees are to be planted in locations that are currently open fields <br />now. Red buds, Virginia pines, and other native plants would be planted to allow a woods type environment to <br />revegetate in those areas. He pointed to another portion of the tract where the largest clearing would occur. The <br />County has a landscape ordinance that requires revegetation or replanting of trees- both large and small, based on <br />street frontage. That is what is proposed. There are approximately 3 or 4 trees per lot that would be replanted. Any <br />time you see a medium to high density residential area, there is a significant amount of clearing that takes place. <br />Once the homes are in, if you go and look at older neighborhood, most of the trees you see were planted when the <br />homes were originally built. <br />Planning Board member Katz asked if there was a policy about what would be done along the sidewalks <br />and street frontage in terms of planting. He asked about types and size of trees. <br />Mr. Murray indicated that sugar maples, willow and other varieties that would have large canopies would be <br />planted. The smaller trees are flowering trees such as dogwood, red bud, crab apple, and crape myrtle. The size of <br />planting would be 1 + to 2 -inch caliber at a minimum. After the initial planting each lot will have two shade and two <br />flowering trees at the very minimum. In addition to that, there will be other landscaping features that will be provided <br />for each home which are more foundation plantings and things of that nature. <br />Planning Board member Katz asked about the possibility that the soil may not drain well and that the trees <br />would be planted in soils that tend to remain moist and would therefore lose their oxygen. He asked if the developer <br />actually knew for a fact that the types of trees that they wanted to plant would survive in those types of soil. <br />Mr. Murray stated that the red maple, sugar maple and other trees would do well in this soil. <br />Chair Brown asked for more detail regarding the size of the parks and what would be available in each. <br />Mr. Murray stated that there are four parks in the plan. At the entrance to the community, off of Lawrence. <br />Road, there is a small pocket park which would have benches and a hedge surrounding it. It is designed for sitting <br />and enjoying the garden type area or visiting with neighbors. Another park is a children/Es otot loth with small sliding <br />boards and other equipment designed for children from three to seven years old. After that age they lose interest <br />and want to play elsewhere. The larger park is shown on the plan with a wooded buffer. He indicated that some <br />clearing would occur and additional shade trees would be planted. An environment would be provided for picnic <br />tables, badminton, volleyball, horseshoes. A - Sunday afternoon picnic for the community could be hosted in this <br />area. This would be approximately 2.7 acres and is connected by sidewalks to several portions of the community. <br />The last park would be a ball field or a soccer field with parking provided. These parks are not lighted. <br />Planning Board Chair, Barrows mentioned that at the last Planning Board meeting the question came up <br />about the surrounding neighbors using these park areas. She remembered that at that time the developers said that <br />would be discouraged because these recreational areas would be primarily for the subdivision residents. She asked <br />for clarification about that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.