Minutes - 19761109 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

the applicant should provide a site plan which does not conflict with any of the possible right of ways options or the site development possibilities as determined by the site analysis. This may be most easily accomplished by a phasing of site improvemens. The commitment to all aspects of the phasing would be recommended as a condition to the granting of the special use permit. The phase plan could be as follows: A. Phase One (maximum, three years): 1. The renovation of the OPC Buildings. 2. The grading and temporary stome or gravel, surfacing of parking for at least 83 cars. 3. The completion of the site analysis. •• 4. The dedication of all rights-of-ways and easements. B. Phase Two (five years): 1. Capital improvements to the Multi-Purpose Center build- ings, including needed renovations to meet current regulations. 2. The paving of parking, walks, and drives. 3. The execution of screening and general landscaping. Discussion ensued between the members of the Board and Mr. Webb. Commissioner Pinney inquired of the cost of paving the walks and drives. Mr. Webb stated that the minimum requirements were for gravel driveways with the utilization of the present paved parking lot. He stated that basically, Chapel Hill was asking for a very modest change involving the immediate building plan and the remainder was spaced over a three to ten year period. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he felt there should be flexi- bility in the use of 'the site and that whatever agency goes into the building should be in the same nature as the Orange-Person-Chatham Mental Health. Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the Board acquire a special use permit that would include the entire site as owned by the County. Comte. missioner Whitted seconded the motion. Discussion ensued. The Board agreed that this w.as the beginning of discussion with Chapel Hill and was not necessarily approving the memo- randum as presented by Mr. Webb. Commissioner Pinney stated that he would like further dialogue with Chapel Hill. The Chairman called for a vote on the motion, and all members of the Board voted aye. The motion was declared passed. The Chairman referred to Item II: Discussion of ways to implement the County's facility plan developed by Mr. Nassif. Mrs. Garrett stated that the Board would like to know how to pro- ceed to get the Facility Plan underway. Commissioner Gustaveson inquired as to the time schedule needed to implement Proprosal A. Mr. Nassif stated that the renovation of the~Grady Brown buildings was the key. He stated that if these buildings were renovated first, everything else would fall in line. He stated that it would take from eight months to one year in construction for the entire building. For design, it would depend on how much time was available to talk with each of the agencies going into the building. He suggested from five to six months for. design and one month for bids, acceptance, and the signing of bids and documents. Mr. Nassif stated further that the County could be ready to go out for bids by April or May of 1977. He added that any of the other buildings could be done simultaneous. Discussion ensued concerning the stress test done on the Grady Brown Auditorium. Mr. Nassif informed the Board that the test results an the strength of the auditorium floor in Grady Brown had not been interpreted yet. He stated that additional supports for the floor from underneath may be necessary, but would not prohibit use of the auditorium. Commissioner Gustaveson stated that to get the facility plan into high gear, the Board needed some parameter as to what would be budgeted