Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 4:39:00 PM
Creation date
7/13/2009 2:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990303
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />Orange Grove Volunteer Dire Department <br />6800 ORANGE GROVE ROAD - <br />HILLSBOROUGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27278 <br />Ed Kerwin, Executive Director <br />Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br />PO Box 366 <br />Cacrboro, NC 27510-0366 <br />Dear Ed, <br />This is a response to your letter of May 8 in which you expressed interest in the proposal that <br />OWASA should compensate the Fire Company for its extensive ownership of land in Bingham <br />Township (and the'land's consequent deletion from the tax roll). This compensation would be in <br />recognition of the fact that we continue to offer fire protection to all of OWASA's facilities in our <br />district. Additionally, we provide protection against woods and brush fires for OWASA's land <br />holdings around Cane Creek reservoir and in the wildlife mitigation areas. <br />In response to your suggestion that we propose an annual amount that OWASA might provide to <br />the Fire Company, our Board of Directors has authorized me to consider the issue, consult with <br />you, and suggest an appropriate amount. <br />It seems to me most reasonable for OWASA simply to make up the fire tax revenue that we <br />would have received had land now owned by OWASA remained in private hands. We could then <br />multiply the acreage by a typical large -tract evaluation and multiply the result by the fire tax rate. <br />Using this principle, we need only three numbers. Fast, the Orange Grove Fire District tax rate is <br />4.5 cents per $100 evaluation. Second, at the recent Planning Board hearing at our fire station, <br />David Stancil, a staff member of the Orange County Planning Board, noted that OWASA owned <br />approximately 2100 acres in Bingham Township. Since virtually all of the Cane Creek watershed <br />in Bingham Township lies in our tax district, this is by far the easiest and simplest figure to use. <br />Lastly, for the per -acre valuation, I suggested that we use the amount suggested to OWASA by <br />the Cadmus Group in its- Cane Creek watershed study (see pages 3 -14). They suggested an <br />average fee - simple value of $5000 per acre based on sales of 20+ acre parcels in the period 1993- <br />1996 as compiled by an appraiser. <br />1 <br />Multiplying 2100 acres by $5000 yields $10.5 million in total evaluation. Multiplying. this value by <br />the fire tax rate of 4.5 cents per $ 100, one gets $4725. On behalf of the Fire Company, therefore, <br />17.6 <br />NOV 5 <br />November 3, 1998 <br />Ed Kerwin, Executive Director <br />Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br />PO Box 366 <br />Cacrboro, NC 27510-0366 <br />Dear Ed, <br />This is a response to your letter of May 8 in which you expressed interest in the proposal that <br />OWASA should compensate the Fire Company for its extensive ownership of land in Bingham <br />Township (and the'land's consequent deletion from the tax roll). This compensation would be in <br />recognition of the fact that we continue to offer fire protection to all of OWASA's facilities in our <br />district. Additionally, we provide protection against woods and brush fires for OWASA's land <br />holdings around Cane Creek reservoir and in the wildlife mitigation areas. <br />In response to your suggestion that we propose an annual amount that OWASA might provide to <br />the Fire Company, our Board of Directors has authorized me to consider the issue, consult with <br />you, and suggest an appropriate amount. <br />It seems to me most reasonable for OWASA simply to make up the fire tax revenue that we <br />would have received had land now owned by OWASA remained in private hands. We could then <br />multiply the acreage by a typical large -tract evaluation and multiply the result by the fire tax rate. <br />Using this principle, we need only three numbers. Fast, the Orange Grove Fire District tax rate is <br />4.5 cents per $100 evaluation. Second, at the recent Planning Board hearing at our fire station, <br />David Stancil, a staff member of the Orange County Planning Board, noted that OWASA owned <br />approximately 2100 acres in Bingham Township. Since virtually all of the Cane Creek watershed <br />in Bingham Township lies in our tax district, this is by far the easiest and simplest figure to use. <br />Lastly, for the per -acre valuation, I suggested that we use the amount suggested to OWASA by <br />the Cadmus Group in its- Cane Creek watershed study (see pages 3 -14). They suggested an <br />average fee - simple value of $5000 per acre based on sales of 20+ acre parcels in the period 1993- <br />1996 as compiled by an appraiser. <br />1 <br />Multiplying 2100 acres by $5000 yields $10.5 million in total evaluation. Multiplying. this value by <br />the fire tax rate of 4.5 cents per $ 100, one gets $4725. On behalf of the Fire Company, therefore, <br />17.6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.