Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2009 2:03:25 PM
Creation date
7/13/2009 1:56:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990303
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Z <br />OWASA's cost estimates for sewers in Chapel Igill and neighborhoods in future annexation areas <br />total about $14 million (See Attachment B). Sewer costs for neighborhoods currently in Town <br />limits total approximately $5.7 million. Xn terms of future annexation areas, there is no State law. <br />which requires us to annex Say or all of the potential annexation leads and clearly no requirement <br />to do so when it would be financially unfeasible. <br />It is likely that many non-municipal systems in the neighborhoods wfil be able to continue with <br />their existing systems for several years. This means that the Town would not need to have all of <br />the potential contrsbution money on hand immediately, but could acccmulate it .over a decade oz <br />more. <br />Rcsnonse to the O WASA Board of I}irectors <br />We are appreciative of the OWASA Board's request for fcedba,ck on the discussion paper on sewer <br />assessments and for the opportunity to make suggestions. We also appreciate the amount of time <br />and thought Board members are giving to this complex issue. Our specific recommendations . <br />follow. <br />Reinstate the past policy of absorbing eugineering,and Legal costs tip to the f5% and 5% <br />limits noted above. <br />Rationale <br />OWASA's enginecrin~ costs for the 5 projects to which the policy was applied came to roughly <br />8%, well within the 15% limit; and 4% for legal costs. If OWASA continues its 15% and 5% <br />policy fo,~ engineering and legal costs, there is the potential for approximate. parity with the Town if <br />a 20% policy is adopted. <br />We believe that that the OWASA Board has the airthority to make its service affordable, a service <br />that is critical when septic systems fail and the public health andlor the cnvironmcnt is threatened. <br />We think that accountability to the electorate is present, because Board members arc appointed by <br />elected officials. Board members arc called upon routinely to make financial decisions, e.g. setting . <br />fees, approving budgets . <br />Proride preliminary cost estimates so that residents signing a petition lmow what to expect. <br />Rationale <br />The request for sewer is initiated by a neighborhood whose residMtC must sign a petition for that <br />service. The petition must contain signatures from at least 50% of the property owners, the <br />majority of whom are must likely not experiencing problems. Revising OWASA's petition form to <br />allow a place to show as estimated cost per lot would be helpful in persuading people to sign the <br />petition. - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.