Orange County NC Website
_• w~-_. ... - --- ~ .. <br />To: Mayor Waldorf and Members of the Town Council <br />From: ~ Juiic McClintock sad Flicks Bateman <br />Subject: Recommendations regarding sewer assessments <br />q ~~/~ S . <br />~`-, ~~,,,w2. <br />AGENnA #9a <br />~~~V <br />The Council and the OWASA Board of Directors have been dealing for some tune with the issue of <br />how sewers in older neighborhoods should be financed. <br />In~January of this year a Mayor's committee was appointed to examine the issues related to <br />establishing a sewer subsidy fund sad to make recommendations to the Council, In June the <br />4WASA $oard asked the Council for feedback oa its March 12 discussion gaper entitled <br />"Assessment Policy Applicable to. Water and Sewer Extensions to Existing Unnerved <br />Neighborhood" (Set Attachment A). The request was rcfcrreci to our committee for tentative <br />recommendations. <br />This report presents our majority recommendations along with a brief history. <br />Majority Report <br />Recommendations to the Mayor and Council <br />Connca Members McClintock and Bateman recommend that the Town provide a 20% <br />subsidy to sewer projects for ezisting neighborhoods with private systems by providing a line <br />item iu the CIP budget. <br />Rationale <br />We support this recommendation for three reasons. First, municipalities must respond the public <br />health, safety, and welfare concerns of their citizens. Providing municipal sewer prevents septic <br />system failures which can cause serious health problems. The Comprehensive Plan discourages <br />the use of septic systems within Town limits for this reason. Second, a subsidy is needed to sewer <br />in Town neighborhoods. In a Town budget of $44 million, it seems reasonable that we could <br />allocate an annual amount for public sewers, one of the most basic needs generally provided by a <br />town or city. All but one ~of the Chapel Hill neighborhoods in the OWASA study found in <br />Attachment B would fact assessments over $10,000, as well as availability fees and plumber costs. <br />Third sad most important, if vve arc to accomplish the objective of sewcriag most in-?'own <br />neighborhoods, thin Chape! Hill must take the lead in setting a policy to accomplish this objective. <br />Neighborhoods require a predictable policy to gain the majority support needed to petition <br />OWASA for service. <br />