Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999
>
Agenda - 03-03-1999 - 9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 4:38:21 PM
Creation date
7/13/2009 12:59:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/1999
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990303
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
RES-1999-013 Resolution of Approval of Woodgreen Subdivision Preliminary Plan
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Concept Plan for <br />Woodgreen Subdivision under the Flexible Development Conservation <br />Option with public roads built to NCDOT standards subject to three <br />conditions: <br />1. Access to all lots shall be limited to the new subdivision roads; <br />2. On the Preliminary Plan, include a 40 -foot buffer along Mooreiields <br />Road as part of the open space protected by restrictive covenants or a <br />conservation easement Provide additional landscaping for screening on <br />lot 27 between the building site and roads; and, <br />I With the Preliminary Plan, submit draft forms of the homeowners <br />association documents and restrictive covenants or conservation <br />easement which contain use and maintenance provisions for the <br />open space and buffers. The restrictive covenants or conservation <br />easement shall designate a back -up grantee, in the event the <br />homeowners association is eliminated. <br />Barrows asked for.clarification of the minimum lot size in the protected <br />watershed area. Cameron responded 40,000 square feet. Barrows <br />continued asking if the open space in the lots along the perimeter is <br />included in the minimum lot size and the response was yes. Cameron <br />continued that in some cases the open space could be usable area when it is <br />included as part of the lot Barrows expressed concern that this subdivision <br />had small lots and did not seem a good representation of open space. <br />Brooks expressed concern, using lot 1 as an example which is .97 acres, <br />that less than 1/2 acre is buildable area. Does the Health Department feel <br />that there is enough area for a septic field and repair area Cameron <br />responded that the Health Department has only done a preliminary soils <br />analysis. She clarified that with average slopes and soils, a septic field and <br />repair area for a three bedroom home requires about 10, 500 square feet. <br />Thus, the possibility is that, once the Health Department does further <br />analysis, there will not be sufficient area to accommodate 27 lots. <br />Chris Lamb, property owner at 2411 Dimmocks Mill Road, expressed <br />concerns with the proposed subdivision. �A letter from Mr. Lamb is also an <br />attachment to these minutes on page ) One concern was with the <br />portion of the application that indicated there were no identified natural <br />areas, habitats, and wildlife corridors. He felt this was very much <br />underestimated. Cameron responded that the purpose of that section of the <br />application is to compare the impacts of conventional and flexible <br />developmem. In 1988, the County joined with Triangle Land Conservancy <br />in identifying wildlife corridors as well as significant natural areas for <br />plants and animals. The wildlife corridor mapped by the biological <br />consultant in the inventory is defined as 100 meters from each side of the <br />stream. Using a map, Cameron demonstrated that the mapped wildlife <br />corridor did not extend to the property in question. <br />W. Lamb continued, reiterating the concerns expressed in his letter (his <br />property is directly across from the proposed project) and e:tpresaed <br />concern with the enforcement of restrictions. He also felt this was not the <br />type of plan envisioned by the County as an. open space plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.