Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
13 <br />exists. Thus, an amendment to the existing agreement will add the <br />proposed lots. <br />Selkirk asked about driveway locations for the existing lots and Cameron <br />indicated those areas on the vicinity map. <br />Barrows asked about the last sentence of condition #2 requiring the ' <br />appointment of a third party in the event the Homeowner's Association. is <br />eliminated. Cameron responded that such a condition had been added to <br />chister and open space plans in order to be sure that it would be permanent <br />and the homeowners could not vote to change that part of the covenants. <br />The Planning Director had indicated that condition should be on all plans. <br />Walters asked what groups or person(s) could be designated as third parties. <br />Cameron responded that there are other entities that would qualify such as <br />Triangle Land Conservancy or The Nature Conservancy. There are not <br />really a lot of options at this time. <br />Strayhorn asked for clarification about a maintenance agreement on open <br />space on an individual lot. Cameron responded that she felt maintenance <br />also means adhering to whatever standards have been set in the covenants <br />and as conditions of subdivision approval. References could be made to <br />clearing storm damage. Also, improvements could be a part of the open <br />space. Stmyhorn continued that his concern was with the wording when it <br />applies to an individual lot; the wording was probably suitable for common <br />open space. <br />Price asked about the private road Cameron responded that was an existing <br />easement that was acquired with the previous minor subdivision and there is <br />a road maintenance agreement on file already. However, the road has not <br />been constructed since there were only two lots. It will be constructed to <br />Class A standards within the easement. Price continued expressing concern <br />with the two acre tract to the east. Cameron responded that property should <br />already be a party to the road maintenance agreement since that lot was <br />created by the minor subdivision. <br />Barrows asked if the concerns expressed at the Neighborhood Information <br />Meeting have been adequately addressed and Cameron indicated then was <br />a good discussion with questions regarding drainage and she felt all-of the <br />concerns have been addressed. <br />MOTION: Allison moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded <br />by Strayhorn. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />(2) Woodgmet Subdivision <br />.. ... (27 Loa - Cheeks Township) <br />Cameron distributed letters that have been received since agenda materials <br />were distributed. <br />The property is located in Cheeks Township at the southern intersection of <br />Moorefields Road (SR 1135) and Dimmocks Mill Road (SR 1134) on the <br />