Minutes - 19761028 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

all the time, in times of drought. It would mean that a draw-down would occur inevitably, and would have to occur if the dam is to serve that purpose. Now on the other hand, it seems to me that the body of water we are talking about is sa great that it is not likely to en- counter a great period of drought. S think if we can, from the point of view of the Authority, be absolutely and finally and completely sure the water supply and the purpose will be the first one and it will be inviolate, then I don't see any disadvantage to the Authority in joint- ly developing the resource there with the County." Arthur Hurow stated "I expressed support of the notion when it was first made public. It was said to me, 'don't you think this is something that they are trying to take away from you?' And I said on the contrary, S think they are trying to develop a partnership approach to this thing and exploit the most viable options that are available to the County Commissioners which don't have. I agree with Jonathan that the primary mission on the purpose of the Water Sewer Authority can become servant to some grant scheme, but I want to add that we are 'working against a specific time table. That to me is pretty well in con- Crete. We made a commitment to the people who live here in the commu- nity at least in the planning stages. Obviously, we haven't planned anything, we haven't made any approaches to the people who own the land, we haven't negotiated with anyone and have na instructions to do it yet,, but we have assured them that we would expedite in every way possible so the kind of summers as we had this summer would not occur, if we can prevent in future summers, we would certainly do that. We also attended a conference with property owners around Cane Creek, and despite the fact that one would like to expedite and do everything in a hurry, we must consider some true hardships that are going to occur to the people up there and they are going to have to be considered. So, on the one hand I say to you we have a timetable, and second, we have to procede cautiously that all those things have consideration, particularly with the individuals that we will be getting into. Maybe, yeu are more aware of that and are closer to it in the County than we are. On the other hand, there are shortages in water and the sewer systems in this town are something that we have solve expeditiously." Gen Hurow stated further that he agreed with Mr. Howes on the matter of making. sure the primary mission of the Cane Creek project is not deluded or forgotten or sent back after six month, a year, ox a year and a half, which would depend on how serious the Authority and the County is about doing this project. Chairman Morris asked that those present talk about some of the delayed potentials. He stated, "as Art said, time is paramount. If the Authority were to go ahead and finance Cane Creek project, the financing would be relatively in a short time, if we sold revenue bonds. Now, if the County were financing, first you would have to have a refe- rendum, is that correct?" The reply was "yes sir." Chairman Morris continued, "and then I wish someone would comment on the time schedule involved in that. And then I wonder if you have thought and talked about what's (time) is involved in some of these other potential sources of revenue, such as you have mentioned, financial aid from federal sources. Is that something that is likely because of the complexities of going from one unit to another unit applying for funds and applying for grants, it's going to take even more time than the selling of bonds. I think we ought to talk about the time involved in getting these." Chairman Garrett sated "I think what the County was waiting for was the meeting here tonight, and I think that if there is some joint interest, the County would have to make some commitment to go full speed ahead. I think the RC&D funds for sediment structures are not difficult to work out." Mrs. Garrett asked the County Manager to comment on this. Mr. Gattis stated that funds may be available and they may not. "If they are available, presumably there would be more than one sediment structure, they may not all be built at one time, it is not necessary that they all be built at one time." Chairman Garrett explained "it is the County's idea that when the lake is built in the beginning, to build sediment structures to retard the sediment from building up in the lake and thus, prolong the life of the lake. Now that is not critical, but it makes sense to plan all of that in the beginning.