Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3 T'~F2 19 ' 99 ~ 09 ~ 12AM ROBERT I W I TTENBERG HOLTKAMP & LA e i s p' 62 6 a s : s ~ <br />. 17 <br />• 1~ tbit a» tbrea ae~ cr •lea in size T}srt ia, is3 sores of 3.479 s~ (~ sad <br />uadevdoped) cow of lot: pf thc+ae acres ar~ in size The subdiviaian staistdatd is <br />sot sstiss3ed.' ".. .. • <br />NC t~ S. l7Ari69.1.(b) Ruthe+r requires t>zstthe ores to be iacorporated,submit s <br />plan £or s rasssaaat~a level o~muaippal sesvioea. To meet tie regtm+eane~t o~t1i~ <br />section. the pasoas submitting the p~ fbr incorpoeihoa must propose to prvvlde st least <br />tvw of the folloyving ~a~ricea: ' ~ . . , , , ~ ~, ' ' ~ ,; . <br />2) Flre pcotecdon. . ~ ' <br />3) .tbab?!6r attd t+elGao ooileataaa and'~atapoeal. <br />4) w~ aia~ .. ~ ~ ~ . <br />S) hewer cnilection er dlspoaa. ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . <br />~ Strom mainte~nce, canstructiw>; or right-of way accryisitian. <br />7) ~Streat <br />8) Adopdoa of atywide plsanir~g sod soaiag. . <br />The petition iaCtuded a list of the Ctuxeat service:that sr~e pcovlded by County sad <br />load a~cies. iiow,rver it did act submit a plan ~ coatim~inp ouch sarviaes. Tba <br />petition also listed service that it intended to provide but no plan £or those services was <br />included either. Stiq, it does propose do pmvlde at least two of tba above strvioes. It <br />dpp~ tl~t NC (~ 5.120.169.1.(b) is ast~a£ied. . <br />S~,j~ 120.17.0-0 Fmdla~ ' to ~OCric~~. <br />NC 1,1.8. 1Z0-170 requires tlwt tlio propoatd aaiaicipalits- cea provide, st s <br />reasonable tax rote, the smvicos requested by tlu petition and that the proposed <br />tnuaiaipslity csa provid®m a reuonable rapt rate ffie types of setvieea usually provided by . <br />similar tnuniaipalities. To help quantify this roquirement DCA eonsider+ed the gr+osis <br />assessment value of the proposed municipality u its tax bsse.~ DCA compared the <br />prey tax rates, property uaeastnsnt vslue+e, and property tax revues often <br />muniapalifies tha# have s poptals#i-on sire s~miLr to tbet of the proposed TOwA of <br />For fiscal year 1997-98 the average property tea rate aad revenue 8xtl~ ~ ~ ' <br />comparison comes were ~0.36JS100 asaasament sad S3S,Z44~'rapeotively (see ' ' <br />?able Fuhibit 2). In order' fbr the proposed ?oan of Hebt+on to 8esarate~ aioailsv; cevessues <br />it would love to levy a property tax rate ~of Z0.16/S 100 a:sesannent (assuming a hotel <br />asa~t of S18,S8S,743 sad a exdmcteoa rase of 97 pecceot}. ~ . • <br />s Pleue apOC that {fie tip reooad tiai provided 10 DCA cosdaiaed sane and~vaa , , <br />miaao$ soma dab. dearpeoctot eiet+e addeawd bit and values mad ~! be missing. B is wet <br />vdikaly that the a~daaimg dm woald atlhct d pe ~ ~ n .m.)- ~a e~c base <br />' Please Hoge dos doe to Wa ~ pc+oportton 'Sa~rslap.d' <br />Syr by pgp{Qpp~Ly lower thta the sorer ol!!ea aaee:seadt liAed in $e t~c:eeoc~de: Tibade ~ilp! <br />made tt Aso pe~bem en enai`jais et'peeeem-we ~ 11de sect baae~ <br />I3~ebrom ~ea~po:.tiao- sway nasave s4 ~ Qs,12at67 aa~ O.s. lzo-t7o (xev. Mo~reava 1, t9sa) <br />1'~ 3 <br />