Browse
Search
Minutes - 19760915
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1976
>
Minutes - 19760915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 3:43:31 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/1976
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in the position of taking all the risk. He stated that the County had <br />a margin of allocation to carry the programs through. <br />Commissioner Gustavesan stated that in order to make a case for <br />next year's budget needs of Title XX, the County needed to take a <br />stand this year. "In terms of the future, it is important to take a <br />risk." <br />Commissioner Whitted stated that from what he was hearing from <br />Mr. Stewart in all probability there would be a reallocation. He <br />stated that the County's first priority would be the Department of <br />Social Services (at the original budget J.evel). He stated if we go <br />on the quarterly plan as Frank Porter Graham had suggested and allocate <br />_ for three months $7,500 for Legal Aid and a three month expenditure <br />for Council on Aging (Chore Service), Frank Forter Graham, and the <br />Life Enrichment Center, the total would be $67,723 which would be spent <br />- over the next three months and then at that time we would be ready for <br />another reallocation. roHe stated he was willing to go with a quarterly <br />review as long as the Board was dealing with the third party contractors <br />and not the Department of Social Services. <br />The Finance Director stated that if you went back to the budgeted <br />level, it would cast the County about $25,000 more, which would change <br />the total from $67,723 to $92,000 for the first quarter. <br />Further discussion ensued. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated that after the first reallocation, <br />we find that the reallocation is not sufficient to cover the needs of <br />the contractors, the County would take another hard look at the contracts <br />and the Title XX budget. <br />After further discussion, Commissioner Whitted offered the following <br />proposal. That the fallowing contracts be extended on a quarterly f+eview <br />basis: Frank Porter Graham through the end of December at a funding <br />level of $8,000 per month, to be $24,000; Life Enrichment Center at <br />the funding level of $3,166 per month and being $9,498 through December; <br />Legal Aid at $12,000 through the end of December; Council on Aging <br />(Chore Service) $1,500 for the year; Department of Social Services, <br />$75,000 through the year at the original budget level. The total cost <br />to fund these prog-rams would be $122,000. Mr. whitted stated that in <br />talking with Mr. Stewart, he felt the reallocation would be sufficient <br />to fund these programs. All contracts would be reviewed at the end of <br />December. The two contracts that would be in "limbo" would be Frank <br />Porter Graham and Life Enrichment Center, and they would be funded <br />through December and then be reviewed. <br />Commissioner Whitted moved that this proposal be approved. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson seconded the motion. <br />Discussion ensued. Chairman Garrett stated that the Contracts <br />reviewal should be in November, although the Contracts would run <br />through December. The County Manager pointed out that the Finance <br />Office must have all bills from persons dealing with the Contractors <br />at the proper time. <br />Commissioner Pinney stated that he was afraid of this proposal <br />that if the reallocations did not come through, the Social Services <br />program would be hurt. <br />The Chairman called for a vote on the motion of Commissioner <br />- Whitted. Voting aye were Commissioner Garrett, Gustaveson, and whitted. <br />Voting nay was Commissioner Pinney. <br />The Chairman declared the motion passed. <br />The Finance Director asked the Board of Commissioners to make a <br />motion to rescind the letters sent to the Contractors terminating <br />their contracts. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson moved that the letters sent to the <br />Contractors be rescinded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.