Browse
Search
Minutes - 19760915
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1976
>
Minutes - 19760915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 3:43:31 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/1976
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Finance Direcor reviewed with the Board a Title XX Administra- <br />tive Recommendation Summary Sheet with showned a proposed reduction in <br />Title XX expenditures for the 1976-1977 Budget year. The Summary Sheet <br />showed a total reduction of Title XX Funds as $335,195 and County match <br />as $17,029. <br />Chairman Garrett requested Robert Stewart, with the Department of <br />Human Resources tc speak to the matter of Title XX allocations. <br />Mr. Stewart stated that the allocaticn of $677,657 was unchanged <br />at this point, however, he could make the same promise which had al- <br />ready been made, that it appears that the State is accumulating suffi- <br />cient funds to make reallocations to those counties who have requested <br />funds in excess of their fair share to cover both the Social Services <br />Programs and the third party providers. Mr. Stewart stated that the <br />State did expect to have figures after checking the September expendi- <br />tures. Three months is needed to examine the spending trends of DSS <br />and their providers before having a figure to be used for reallocations. <br />He stated that between the first two weeks of October, the State would <br />know the spending trend for the 1st quarter of this fiscal year, and <br />the Division anticipated reallocation shortly thereafter. He stated <br />that the County Commissioners could look for something in writing about <br />the latter part of 'October. <br />The County Manager asked how the reallocation plan would work. <br />Mr. Stewart replied that there would be two reallocations. The <br />first reallocation would be in keeping with what the STate can safety <br />pledge to those counties who are in need in excess of their budget. <br />The second reallocation will come somewhere around January when at that <br />time the Division will have a history of six months of spending. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson asked if there would still be a final re- <br />allocation. <br />Mr. Stewart replied that should a county still have a deficiency <br />after the second reallocation, they could look forward to an additional <br />reallocation. He stated that the State intended to utilize all Title <br />XX monies. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson inquired if this same formula would be <br />used for the next fiscal year, or if the Division would look at the <br />expenditure level of each County in terms of the first allocation given. <br />He stated the need to be able to look ahead to have the same potential <br />budget level for programs of next year. <br />Mr. Stewart stated that as Counties who have underspent begin to <br />expand there will be less to reallocate and that Counties could not <br />count on the same amount fox reallocation. He stated that the formula <br />may be changed next year and the expenditure level would be taken in <br />account.of, but unless the Federal Share is increased, you cannot count <br />on reallocation each year thereafter to finance your programs and the <br />Counties will have to make a decision as to who will finance their <br />programs. He said that the zeallocation he was speaking of now was to <br />help counties through this year. <br />Chairman Garrett invited persons from the provider groups to speak. <br />Dr. James Gallagher, Director of the Frank Porter Graham School <br />spoke on behalf of the School day care center which is designed to aid <br />the growth and development of preschool aged children from low income <br />families in Orange County. Dr. Gallagher stated that he sympathized <br />with the Department of Social Services, but the needs were great and <br />he felt that Frank Porter Graham was providing some of the services <br />provided by Social Services in an area of mandated services. <br />Dr. Gallagher stated that he felt Frank Porter Graham could pro- <br />vide the County with strategy whereby the County would not suffer the <br />consequences, but that Frank Porter Graham would be suffering the con- <br />sequences, if a reallocation was not sufficient to cover expenditures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.