Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2009 4:19:43 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:19:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/31/1999
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1B
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990331
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~-a~rn~~ ~ b <br />March 22, 1999 <br />Update to Mayor and Town Council <br />Re: Schools and Land Use Task Force <br />From: Council Member Julie McClintock <br />The Schools and Land Use Task Force met on March 10. This group has met for <br />nearly 2 years. About 9.months ago the group suggested that Orange County, <br />Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough attorneys study whether concurrence <br />principles could be applied to school facilities through ordinances adopted by <br />Orange County governments. The principle of concurrence is that planning <br />approvals are paced to the adequate provisifln of public facilities to support <br />them. <br />A verbal report was delivered at the March 10 meeting by Geof Gledhill, Orange <br />County attorney, who gave a summary of a model that could work.. No enabling <br />legislation is required, he said. He said the first step is .for all. parties <br />to enter into an agreement or agreements: (1) to develop a facilities plan _ <br />for school needs for a certain period of time,- say 10 years; and (2) for•each <br />planning jurisdiction to adopt an ordinance which would prohibit the • <br />permitting of a development project over a certain size unless it had a <br />certificate from the appropriate School Board, certifying that adequate school <br />facilities are or will be available when the demand is generated by the <br />buildout of the development. ~ The second step is to develop the school <br />facilities plan. The third step is for the planning governments to adopt the• <br />ordinances. The ordinances and agreements would insure that the pace of "' <br />development approvals would not exceed the capability of Orange County <br />government to provide classroom space for children. <br />The Task Force acknowledged that the County would still need to fiord the means <br />to pay for new schools and the school boards would still need to build new <br />schools. If these ordinances were adopted by all jurisdictions, then they <br />would create an incentive for developers to "sweeten the deal" by donating . <br />land and other amenities for schools. Task force members further agreed with <br />the suggestion that it is essential to develop criteria for land appropriate <br />for siting of .schools, e.g. a high'+usable site, available public facilities, a <br />site large enough for joint facilities, and located near enough to the area to <br />be served. Alternatively, the idea of receiving money in lieu of land was <br />considered. . <br />Craig Benedict, Orange County Planner,"described how this system might work. <br />School boards would determine school needs through a requirement that each <br />developer meet with the school system to discuss what are the student <br />generation rates and the associated school needs of the proposed project based <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.