Minutes - 19760907 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

i~ ~ Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Pinney, it was moved and adopted that.the preliminary plat of Grampian Hills Phase IS be appraised. G. Allen and Mayes - This plat was tabled at the Commissioners' August session. The Planning Staff is re-presenting the plat in order that they might inquire in more detail the exact question the Board of Commissioners is raising about the plat. Mr. Edwards stated that Mr. A11en was now in the process of trying to get an agreement with pro- perty owners for the maintenance of the road. He inquired just what might be acceptable to the Commissioners. Discussion ensued concerning dividing of ten acre lots and the _ legal requi~emehts. Mr. Edwards presented one other matter to the Commissioners which pertained to Tumblerun. He stated that the Planning Board had approved the sketch plan for Tuinblerun and the developer had requested that the Commissioners look at the sketch plan and indicate just what is accept- able. He stated that Chapel Hill and Carrbaro would submit written reports concerning Tumblerun, and that he had requested reports from Ray Green, the 208 Study Group and Everette Billingsley. The next item for discussion was Road Standards. The Planning Board had made some minor amendments to the proposed subdivision road standards and are re-submitting the new standards to the Board of Commissioners. The Chairman stated the County Attorney needed to change the language in some areas of the amendments. Discussion ensued about people who wished to put in private roads. Mr. Edwards was asked to bring the road standards back to the Board at its third Tuesday meeting in September. Ervin Dobson, Planning Director, stated that he, the County Manager, and the County Attorney had reviewed the questions proposed from the previous week's public hearing concerning the zoning amendments. He inquired if the Board wished these questions to be answered in writing. Discussion ensued concerning the proper procedure for answering questions for the scheduled hearing. on September 1, 1976. Mr. Dobson was requested to have answers to all questions in writing. Stem 14: The County Manager has previously provided the Board Members with several minor amendments to the County Personnel Ordinance. He recommends these amendments be adopted. These modifications fall in the housekeeping class and are as follows: 1. The State will prepare an amended version of Secion 2 (b) that will incorporate merit system and extension service employees more fully into this policy. 2. On June 27th, the U. S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the Federal Fair Labox Standards Act as it applied to State and Local Governments. Several references to this Act appear in our policy. Those sections should be amended or deleted to clearly state the County policy without reference to this Act. 3. Article I, Section 6 is amended to add to the duties of the County Manager the responsibility of preparing a list of all classes of employees to be excluded from the "overtime" pay category. This duty was assigned the Manager in Article III, Section C; however, that section will be deleted in the States new recommendations. 4. This amendment rewrites the sentence to avoid use of the term "Fair Labor Standards Act". 5. To rewrite the overtime pay section, re-defining the policy of overtime pay and establishing a policy of distributing of overtime work. Heretofore, overtime pay had to be made if an employee per- formed overtime work during the week in which he was paid (FLSA). The new provision will allow overtime work during one pay period to be compensated for by time off during a following pay period.