Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 4:49:15 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/31/1999
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990331
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />In considering instructional delivery models and strategies, the sub - committee's <br />findings reflected the initial need to reduce the ESL teacher /student ratio to <br />better serve students. The federal government guidelines on education of LEP <br />students recommend a 1:20 ratio, giving ESL teachers an opportunity to provide <br />direct services to students and opportunities to coordinate across instructional <br />programs with teachers within the school setting. Other findings include the <br />need to have bilingual staff in schools with large language minority groups; <br />individual school resource centers; and comprehensive, on -going services to <br />support LEP students during the 5-7 year period needed to become <br />academically proficient. The instructional delivery models examined by the <br />sub - committee included the following: <br />(1) Sheltered classes at the secondary level in History, ELP <br />(Economics, Legal and Political Systems), and Biology <br />(2) Clustered content classes at elementary level <br />(3) Literacy Groups <br />(4) Dual Immersion (Two-Way Bilingual) Programs <br />(5) Proficiency Grouping of LEP Students <br />(6) Multi - Content -Based ESL Instruction <br />(7) ESL Reading classes for target language beginners <br />(8) ESL Centers for Secondary Schools (designate one site) <br />(9) Newcomer Center for Port -of -Entry <br />Sub - Committee on Staff Development and Support for School Staff: <br />Highlights of this sub- committee's findings are comments and suggestions <br />collected from a surrey of school staff. The surrey responses indicate a level of <br />frustration on the part of non -ESL teachers and staff related to having. the <br />necessary training needed to appropriately address the instructional needs of <br />LEP students. Addidonal findings also disclose that regular classroom teachers <br />do not know (or feel they do not know) much about LEP students or ESL <br />programs. The survey findings further indicate that some teachers are hoping <br />that the challenges presented by the presence of LEP students in their <br />classrooms will simply.go away or resolve themselves in time. The findings <br />also show that some teachers are not trying alternative methods of instruction or <br />assessment with LEP students. Finally, the survey findings indicate that 80% of <br />teachers do not directly communicate with parents of LEP students. See <br />Appendix D for a copy of the detailed sub - committee report. <br />Sub - Committee on Translation and Interpretation Services: <br />The need for translating documents and interpreting conversations is great in <br />the Chapel Hill- Canboro City Schools rding to the findings of this sub- <br />committee. Interviews with LEP parents and teachers reflect many concerns <br />about the issue of translation and interpretation services. See Appendix E for a <br />copy of the detailed sub - committee report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.