Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999
>
Agenda - 03-31-1999 - 1a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2013 4:49:15 PM
Creation date
7/8/2009 4:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/31/1999
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1A
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990331
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.5- <br />(5) LEP families and students have problems with interpreters <br />who are not fluent enough. Also, they feel that there aren't <br />enough interpreters: . <br />(6) They encounter racism on the part of some school staff <br />and tensions between African Americans and Hispanics. <br />(7) Parents are unfamiliar with how the school works. <br />(8) Parente have concerns about how their children deal with <br />US culture and values around drugs, alcohol, and sexuality. <br />(9) LEP families feel the critical need to have multi -- language <br />personnel in special services and other services at the <br />schools and Lincoln Center, the administrative office. <br />Additional findings include the need to recruit volunteer families to pair up with <br />LEP families to become familiar with school system procedures and polices. <br />Finally, in surveying parents, many fait the need for ESL teachers to have a <br />smaller studentReacher ratio for better coordination and collaboration with <br />regular classroom teachers, administrators, parents, and other staff. <br />Sub- Committee on Instruatlonsl Delb= Models-, The highlights of this <br />sub - committee's findings relate to (1) the registration process at Uncoln Center <br />which initiates the identification of LEP students for ESL services at school sites, <br />(2) assessing of students for ESL services, and (3) instructional delivery models <br />and stmte ies. See a detailed copy of the sub-committee's report in <br />Appendix C. <br />For many families of LEP students, the school registration process is not 'user <br />friendly.' There are no dear -cut guidelines on orienting families to the school <br />district. AMxK* the home language survey is completed by parents for early <br />identification purposes, weeks go by before the ESL teacher receives a copy of <br />the survey to initiate the assessment of students for ESL services. <br />Following identification of LEP students via home language survey, teacher <br />referral, and parent recommendation, ESL teachers informally and formally <br />assess students to determine their level of English proficiency for entrance into <br />the ESL program. Once- In the program, LEP students' academic and language <br />progress is monitored regularly by ESL and regular classroom teachers. When <br />students roach a level of English proficiency to discontinue ESL services, <br />several criteria are considered: (1) quality of work in student's portfolio, (2) <br />results of formal testing, (3) oral proficiency, (4) writing proficiency, (5) EOG or <br />EOC test results, (6) collaborative agreement among parents, ESL teacher and <br />regular classroom teacher, and (73 adherence to school system guidelines on <br />exiting -students from ESL services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.