Agenda 04-20-1999 - 9d - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

18 ' MARCH 20, 1999 REPORT Orange County Planning StatY Comments CONSISTENCY Between the Fac~itated Small Area for Carrboro's Northern Study Area and Proposed Amendments to the Carrboro Land Use Ordinance Section 2.6C of the Joint Planning Agreement requires that (w)henever Chapel hill proposes to anund the tact of its Land Development Ordinane~ and whenever Carrboro proposes to a»:end the text of its Land Use Ordnance, the respective towns shall deliver a copy of the full text of the proposed amendment to Orange county not later than thirty (30) days before the date of the public hearing on any such amendment. The agreement further states that (u)nless Orange County with the respective towns a written objection on or before the date of the public hearing on the Proposed ordnance amendment; then adoption of the amendment by the respective town shall automatically t, fled a corresponu0ng amendment to the applicable ordinance adopted by reference by Orange County as provided in Sedrion 21 G Any such objection shall be based on a deternu'nation by Orange County that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the adopted .joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. Proposed amendments to the Carrboro Laced Use Ordinance (hereafter referred to as the NSA Ordinance) to implement the recommendation of the Facilitated Small Area Plan for Carrboro's Northern Study Area were received in the specified timeframe. The amendments consist of 29 revisions or additions to the existing ordinance comprising 35 pages; some revisions are contained in one sentence whereas others are multiple pages in length. Additional attachments include vernacular architechual standards with photographs aced illustrations. The approach to analyzing conformity of the 29 revisions with the adopted small area plan ax this stage is brief. The title or content of each section is listed below with a brief assessment of its consistency or inconsistency with the adopted plea. The primary intent is to identify areas needing further investigation. :'. Section 1. The article and section references corttadried iri this ordinwnce are to the Carrbom land;Use GMdinarrce. Consistent ~ Inconsistent Not Addressed Not Applicable X Comments: ~ ' Section 2. Residerttiad ~ of ma~ jor developments in certain districts Consistent X Inconsistent Not Addressed Not Applicable Comments: Formula for determining constrained lands needs to be same in plan and ordinance.