Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-14-1999 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Agenda - 04-14-1999
>
Agenda - 04-14-1999 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 8:42:26 AM
Creation date
6/23/2009 12:33:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/1999
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19990414
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kimberly Ann Brewer 301 Purefoy Road, Chapel Hill N.C. 27514 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: John Hawkins <br />FROM: , Kimberly Brewer <br />RE: Defining Town Buildout <br />DATE: February 10, 1999 <br />I am sorry to say I will be out of Town February 15 when our Comprehensive Plan Work <br />Group meets with the Councit. I wanted to follow up the Group's recent discussion about <br />the need to better define key terms such as affordable housing, density, and buildout. <br />I <br />Particularly, I'd like to share my concerns about the current definition of "buildout" and <br />suggest an alternative method of projecting build-out conditions. <br />First, let me say why build-out analysis is important. The analysis should assist the commu- <br />nity in understanding the level of development it has authorized through zoning and other <br />land use controls. It is not intended to project a given population or development that will <br />occur, simply that which could occur under our Town's current regulations. The other impor- <br />tant use of the build-out analysis is to help answer, Are we able to achieve our goals <br />under existing programs and regulations? If not, what additional strategies are needed and <br />where?" Only through understanding what is authorized in each Town district canwe begin <br />to' answer these questions. <br />The I Data Book the Work Group recently received states that 90% of the Town is devel- <br />oped. According to the staff, this figure is based on (1) excluding all University property, and <br />(2) an assumption that a parcel is undeveloped if it is either undeveloped completely or <br />underdeveloped (defined by having 1 house per 3 or more acres). Therefore, if a 2.9 acre <br />parcel currently. has 1 house, the lot is defined as fully developed at this density. Compare <br />this to the 11 units or more that.could be built on the parcel under our low density zoning <br />category. <br />To get some perspective on buildout, I reviewed two tables the Planning Department pre- <br />pared for the 1986 Land.Use Plan. These tables show 1984 Land Use and Land Use <br />Buildout. Although the Urban Service Area is now 4000 acres smaller, the tables which I've <br />attached nicely summarize 1984 and projected conditions. Using the revised Urban Ser- <br />vices Boundary/Land Use Plan Map in our packet, I also did a very rough, back-of-the- <br />envelop estimate of housing buildout potential for residential areas. This rough estimate <br />yielded a buildout potential of approximately 67,000 units. Currently, we have 17,345 <br />housing units. This rough approach indicates we are at about 25% of housing buildout <br />potential. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.