Minutes - 19760511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

this Board does or does not wish to go on record as approving as a matter of policy the preservation of the Eno and its environs, and once that policy is settled by this Board another broader question should be addressed, that of whether this Board does or does not with to adopt a question with regard to public access to the Eno River and its environs. Another area of thought is goals and whether this Board wishes to take a position as to the possession of additional park land within the Compeunds of Orange County by the State or the County. Dr. Lang, a member of the Task Force stated that the primary issue is the issue of condemnation as a means of acquiring land. This is the key and had caused the conflict in the County. Dr. Lang stated .that in answer to question that were raised earlier, he would like to make the following statement. One question raised was implementation or protection of the land. Dr. Lang referred to Mr. Whi~ted's proposal which stated that a Planning Board would be named to initiate temporary zoning provisions that would limit certain kinds of destructive development within the Eno River basin for a limited period of time which would allow time for a development of a plan. Dr. Lang inquired how will you develop a large enough board; haw will you get the money to finance this sort of planning. Dr. Lang suggested that the money saved by limitation of growth will eventually return many fold the investment of money in planning. He stated that another means of acquiring money would be through the RC & D funds and that the Planning Department might apply for these funds to develop a stronger Planning Department within Orange County to address the problem of preserving the Eno. Chairman Garrett stated that she would like to see this started right away and that RC & D funds take time to secure. Dr. Lang said that in reply to Mr. Olive's comment concerning the need for additional parklands in North Carolina, that Mr. Olive's figures were based on late 1960 and early 1970 figures. Dr. Lang filed with the Board a graph which he had prepared relative to parkland and population. Chairman Garrett asked Commissioner Whitted if he would present to those present his Proposal for Policy Statement on the Eno River. Commissioner Whitted stated that the proposal was taken from both reports of the Eno River Task Force and addressed the essential issues which had caused con- . troversy. He stated further that he basically started out with the set out guidelines for the Task Force and has addressed those issues and has provided a policy statement for the Board to consider and possible adopt. Commissioner Whitted referred to Section I of the Palicv Statement and discussion ensued as the definition of environs of the Eno River. The Board agreed that the Environs of the Eno would be define in the master plan. After a lengthy discussion, Dr. Lang suggested that the first portion of Section T of the Policy Statement be changed to read "The Eno River and the environs, necessary for conservation of the botanical, fish life, wild life, and most important water supply characteristics is of sufficient interest and importance to the enhancement of the .quality of life for the citiaens of Orange County and this region to be preserved in perpetuity." Mr. Whitted and the Board agreed to this change. Mr. Whitted continued with Section II of the Policy Statement. By what means (concrete, practical and effective) can the Eno River and its environs in Orange County be preserved in perpetuity? In Subsection A of Section II, Stewart Barber, a member of the Task Force, requested that the word• perpetuity be omitted since further on in the proposal the usage of words "given number of years" was used. Commissioner Walker suggested that the change should read "whose use shall be restricted for preservation of the river."