Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-16-2009 - Infor Item 3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 06-16-2009
>
Agenda - 06-16-2009 - Infor Item 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2009 3:50:45 PM
Creation date
6/12/2009 3:46:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/16/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Info I
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090616
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 are facing and to provide options (tax assistance, land link programs, community gardens, <br />2 incubators, etc.) to help overcome those obstacles. <br />3 <br />4 4) Local officials must continue to educate residents on the indirect benefits of agriculture to <br />5 the community. In 2006, the American Farmland Trust conducted a Cost of Community <br />6 Services Study for Orange County and determined that on average, for every $1 in revenue <br />7 raised by residential development, the County must spend $1.24 on services, compared to <br />8 just $0.72 cents of services per dollar of revenue raised by farm, forest, or open space. <br />9 This is a significant difference for a county with traditionally high property taxes due to a <br />10 strong public school system and small commercial tax base. It likewise supports the use of <br />11 local funds for agricultural conservation easements, since costs will be recovered in the long <br />12 run. <br />13 <br />14 5) Local officials must also begin a dialogue with the municipalities in and adjacent to Orange <br />15 County regarding agricultural issues. It will become increasingly important for the <br />16 agricultural community to have an opportunity for input as the towns consider new <br />17 annexations and new land use regulations, because of the potential for unintended negative <br />18 consequences on farmers. These are the same farmers who preserve rural character, clean <br />19 water, clean air, and provide locally grown food. <br />20 <br />21 Orange County has had great success with its conservation easement program, Lands Legacy, <br />22 particularly in conjunction with state and federal funding programs, but the best long-term <br />23 approach for a strong agricultural economy is to strengthen existing farm operations and <br />24 enhance opportunities for new ventures. The 2005 Carolina Agricultural Development and <br />25 Farmland Preservation Enabling Act and associated Agricultural Development and Farmland <br />26 Preservation (ADFP) Trust Fund offers North Carolina counties a new opportunity to develop <br />27 strategic plans for improving the viability of local agriculture and the potential funding to bring <br />28 them to fruition. The long-term survival of agriculture in Orange County requires three key <br />29 components: keeping productive soils in operation, making farming more profitable, and <br />30 producing new farmers and farm operations. Non-farmers must also understand their role in <br />31 sustaining the agricultural community. Farmers must be able to make a living off the land. <br />32 Without economically viable agriculture, much of our rural character and its associated benefits <br />33 to the community are lost, but with careful planning the growing population can contribute to <br />34 the future of local agriculture as consumers for locally grown and value-added farm products <br />35 and as visitors for agritourism. <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />Draft 6/1/2009 Executive Summary Page iii of v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.