Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />The enduring vitality of Orange County's agriculture has been, and will continue to be, tested by <br />competing uses for the land. Once farmland is covered with roads, subdivisions and shopping <br />centers, it is probably lost to productive agriculture forever. With a growing population to feed <br />in the coming years, productive farmland should be viewed as an important resource, worthy of <br />protection, for use in the production of food and fiber. <br />10 Agricultural Surveys <br />11 In January 1998, the Orange County Agricultural District Advisory Board (later renamed the <br />12 Agricultural Preservation Board) and the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District sponsored <br />13 a countywide agricultural survey.- Information from the survey was intended for inclusion in the <br />14 county's Economic Development Plan as part of a new agricultural component of the strategic <br />15 plan. 535 copies of the survey were mailed local farmers using the Cooperative Extension <br />16 Office mailing list. 165 responses were received (31% response). Key findings were as follows: <br />17 50% cited having problems hiring outside the family for labor, mainly because of the <br />18 inability to offer a competitive wage. <br />19 72% noted an increase of environmental regulations that impacted their operation, <br />20 particularly related to watershed protection. <br />21 67% noted changes in land use and impact of residential development bordering their <br />22 property as a challenge, including 25% citing neighbor complaints, mainly, due to odors. <br />23 60% plan to continue farming, but 70% noted more restrictive planning and zoning <br />24 regulations as the deciding factor to discontinuing the operation. <br />25 20% cited failure to make a profit; chemical and fertilizer costs were the attributed as <br />26 the largest costs limiting profit. <br />27 38% of farmers reported a making a profit; 35% broke even. <br />28 • 79% listed participating in the Present-Use Valuation Program. <br />29 70% stated that taxes are a strong factor in profitability. <br />30 More than 75% would like to see a reduction in taxes on farm machinery, buildings and <br />31 residences. <br />32 40% listed interest in Land or Farm Link or Farm Finder program to help young persons <br />33 interested in entering farming as a livelihood. <br />34 • 70% were interested in the creation of a farm advocate to represent agricultural <br />35 interests in local government. <br />36 <br />37 In February of that same year (1998) Orange County began holding an annual Agricultural <br />38 Summit. The "Ag Summit" has become very popular over the years with presentations from <br />39 state and regional experts on new programs and changing regulations, farmers sharing success <br />40 stories and more recently buyers seeking locally grown products for their businesses. Surveys <br />41 are also conducted at the end of each agricultural summit to evaluate the year's program and to <br />42 identify current strengths and challenges within the local agricultural community. <br />43 <br />44 The most common problems identified in the 2008 Agricultural Summit Survey include: <br />45 • Falling Prices and Low Profitability <br />46 Regulations <br />47 Start-up Costs/Lack of Sufficient Money <br />Dratt 6/1/2009 Challenges to Agriculture 15 <br />