Minutes - 20090305 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commissioner Yuhasz said that he would like information that he can understand about the utilities. He would like to know what it would cost the County if it had to send out new valuations, such as going back to 2005 values. Commissioner Pelissier said that she would like to see some categories with the revaluation and how many properties have had very large increases. Regarding communication, she said that every op-ed should be on the County's website. She would also like to address, on a future agenda, the citizens who have always lived in Orange County and who are now on fixed incomes. This is a problem that is only going to get worse. Commissioner Nelson said that the County Commissioners heard from people that property values in Orange County have fallen, but he has heard from realtors that this is not true. He asked the Manager get an assessment of house values in Orange County from a realtor's association or related group. He said that Orange County has had 20 years of tax increases in a row and people have hit the wall, and when the Board of County Commissioners say it is going to be revenue neutral people do not believe them. Commissioner Jacobs said that there is a lot of talk at-large about opportunities on how to do things differently. He would like to think strategically about revaluations and whether a four-year cycle is smart or if it would be more responsive to market changes to have a shorter cycle. He would like to know the ramifications of this in terms of staffing, budgeting, etc. For years, there has been very little comment about revaluations. He would like to be more proactive to avoid the "sticker shock" of this year. Donna Coffey went back to the salmon-colored sheet and said that she took the revenue base from last year, the $174.3 million, and based on the Board's target funding for education, 48.1% would be $83.84 million. Out of this, $18.6 million would be dedicated to debt service. This is in line with the current funding plans that the Board of County Commissioners will have in April. The debt service will be postponed for one year and will be picked up in 2010-11. This will impact 2010-11. Regarding Recurring Capital, 2.2 cents of property taxes is dedicated to this. The $3 million will be split between the two districts. Long-Range Capital is $4.3 million. In accordance with the Board's practice for the last 3-4 years, Fair Funding has been allocated to the two school districts to pay for School Resource Officers, a portion of the school nurses, and a portion of the school social workers. This is $988,000. When all of this is taken out, this leaves $56.9 million available for current expense. If this is applied to the number of students anticipated, this equates to $3,011 per pupil compared to $3,200 per pupil in the current fiscal year. Commissioner Nelson asked about the $3,011 per pupil and if the proposed school budget was based on this and Donna Coffey said that it was based on the $3,200. She said that staff met with the Superintendents on Tuesday to let them know about these numbers. Commissioner Jacobs said that it would be useful at some point to track the years of per pupil spending and see the rise. He said that 48.1% is still pretty high and it has driven the tax rate to some extent. Donna Coffey made reference to the third page and said that she took a similar approach with the County operation side, which is 51.9%. This equates to $90.5 million, which is a decrease of$4 million for County operations. There are some mandated items that the County has to fund. The County's share of the debt service for next year is $7 million. Worker's compensation is mandated and is $1.25 million. Unemployment insurance is about$60,000. There should be no more Medicaid in the budget. There are other mandated DSS programs that total $2.53 million. The remaining funds for the County after the mandated items total