Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-2009 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 06-02-2009
>
Agenda - 06-02-2009 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:11:42 PM
Creation date
5/29/2009 5:28:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090602
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 3 <br />5 <br />Orange County Staff Comments on <br />Rogers Road Small Area Plan Task Force Report <br />Cost of Water /Sewer Improvements (County Manager's Office): <br />The most problematic part of implementation may be gaining public financing for <br />water /sewer improvements and the most controversial the Homestead -like <br />exemption to address long term property ownership and affordability. It should <br />be clear that grants are to be primary or sole funding source for water and sewer <br />improvements. <br />Claim of Well Contamination (Solid Waste): <br />Comment in second paragraph (p 9, History) regarding contaminated wells is <br />absolutely not true; not a single piece of reliable /legitimate evidence has ever <br />been presented, and two series of evaluations of local wells by the Orange <br />County Health Dept. has in fact concluded no trace of landfill contamination has <br />been discovered. The County strongly refutes this assertion. <br />Roadways Problematic (Solid Waste): <br />Given the minimal landfill buffers and storm water and other landfill support <br />features that are present, it seems unlikely that the roadways noted would be <br />feasible from a regulatory perspective. It is also not likely that public roadways <br />would be considered located so close to the actual waste disposal cells. <br />Alternative routes should be explored. <br />Use of Neville Tract (Solid Waste): <br />The Neville Tract is an essential component of landfill operations, serving as the <br />source of final cover soil for landfill closures (C &D landfill will close approximately <br />2027) and is the site where emergency storm debris is stored following being <br />ground. Until a new location for emergency storm debris management is <br />obtained, this tract is a critical part of local emergency management <br />infrastructure. Planning efforts should focus on the Greene Tract and assume <br />Neville is not available for some time. <br />Protection of Streams and Wetland (Environment and Resource <br />Conservation Department (ERCD) Special care should be taken to avoid <br />encroachment on two Bolin Creek headwater streams and associated wetlands <br />on this property as identified by Goldstein & Associates, Inc. (2000). A copy of <br />the Goldstein report is available from ERCD. Any school facilities should be <br />designed and sited to avoid the Bolin Creek headwater streams and associated <br />wetlands by Goldstein & Associates, Inc. (2000). <br />Construction of Trails and Other Recreation Opportunities on the Greene <br />Tract: (ERCD) ERCD supports the construction of natural trails and a paved <br />greenway trail as long as those facilities are properly located to minimize adverse <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.