Minutes - 19760202 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Januar~T of 19?6, and was referred back to the Planning Board ,or .? 90 additional study, I;s e result of the additional stud;;, tt-,e P.e^r, '._:~ L'vard changed its ori~;i^al position of uncuaiified approval of ~::.°.s plat to one of te:.tative approval perd.ing thy: res~;lt of: 1, Satisf~ctor;,~ percolation test results or. each 1.v t, 2, i•, detail soil survey of the entire tract b;,T a qualifie? soil scientist to determine the feasibility of the indivic:,:F;, ep c tt~~nl;.. 3~. ~evalop~.ng are adequate sediment control plan. ;~r. Edwards stated that the developer of Timberline had agreed that each lot would have four (1.~) holes bored for perk tort and t!~^t • this would be done by a soil scientist in order.•that the final plat would reflect all charges that wore needed to be made in the area. Discussion ensued. Commissioner l^Jalker moved that the plat for Timbarl.ine ba apr~roted subject to the condition set forth by the Planning Depart:nert, This motion died for lack of a second. ::r. Robert J. Page, Developer of Timberline, spoke to the conditions that had been outlined by P1r. Edwards. He stated thFt if sewerage lines were available they wiould be installed. However, the Town of Chapel Hill would not be able to confirm an~* lines far a period of three to five yeErs. He stated that he had every intentions of complying with the PlanninC Ordinance and that he would like to have an approval of the Preliminary :'let in order to xove ahead with tine development of the property. He stated that he would agreed to install sewer lines if they cpuld be secured, Chairman 'Garrett advised ;;r. Page that the Board wished to have an Opportunity to talk with the Town of Chapel Hill on the 16th of the month ir_ order to secure an answer to the current sewerage problem, This matter would be brought back to the Board: Upon,motior. of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the Board defer action o: the Timberline plat ur_til the first _~Ionday ir. March, Chairman Garrett referred to Item ~9 on the Agenda: Represents- .. tives of Triangle J Council of Governments will review a series of comments they prepared for presentation to the United States Corp of r,nginesrs concerning the B. Everett Jordon Dam and Reservoir. (This Discussion took place during lunch), N;r. Frank Chamberlain filed with the Board Environmental Statements which had been completed by the Triangle J Council of Governments concerning the B. Everett Dam and Lake. I".r. Chamberlain introduced Roger Schecter, t_he Environmental Advisor, on the 208 Staff at.tk;e Triangle J. David Reynolds, :~r,• Schecter, Pearson Stewart, and Frank Chamberlain worked in the pre- paration of this report which stated thEt the supplemental environ- mental impact statement of the'Gorps of Engineers :rust be commented upon by any interested party before February yth, if they-desired to supplement or contradict the statement prepared by the Corp of Engineers. i~r. Schecter slated that the Council of_Governments has made essentially five :recommendations about-the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: 1, Impoundment should not be allowed until the area 201 studies are completed. 2, Intensive mor_itoring for water quality. _. 3. The.Corp of Engineers and Council of Government should work to determine significance of non point sources of pollutior_, ~. P•lanagement plans for wildlife and forrestry should be developed for dry dam operation. s. The Corp of Engineers should perform additional cost benefit studies for: e. Dry Dam operation ___, b, Multipurpose reservoir operations The County Commissioners agreed to adept the document entitled "Regional Comments concerning the Final Er_cTironmental Statement for the $. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake" as chair posi-