Browse
Search
Minutes - 19760120
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1976
>
Minutes - 19760120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 9:48:09 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:15:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/20/1976
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1'94 <br />4 i~ <br />January 13, 1976 <br />MEMO TO: Orange County Board of Cpmmi.ssioners <br />FROM: Neal Evans, Finance Director <br />SIIBJECT: Revenue & Expenditure Report- Decexnber'31, 1975 <br />Attached are Financial Reports £or various Orange County Funds as of <br />December 31, 1975, <br />The general picture is that both expenditures and revenues aze~'very close -~ <br />to expectations, although the most significatt revenue, item, the current property <br />tax, is still an unknown quantity. The majarity.of this tax is received in the <br />final days of December aad is not processed until January. P'IQ tax revenues are <br />shown for December. Consequently the extent of the fiscal health of the county <br />will not be known in full until the January tax reForts are completed. <br />FUND BALANCES <br />Unappropriated fund balance, that is, the excess pf actual over anticipated <br />fund balances at June 30, 1975, is probably the most significant weakness <br />identified on the report. This should be measured in connectipn with excess <br />revenues, under expenditures', and available contingencies. The four items added <br />together form a pool of Funds that can serve several purposes. First, it can <br />provide for "emergencies" should these azise; second, it can provide a needed <br />cash flow, in the case of Orange County, for the early months of the next Fiscal <br />.year; it can provide an elastic buffer for a consistent tax rate policy; and it <br />presents an indicator of the quality of financial planning and management to the <br />state and national bond markets: The weakness with the current fund balance; is <br />that, in conjunction with a budget that was estimated so tightly and a contingency <br />fund that has been depleted, there is no pool of Funds for any o£ the abpve purposes. <br />Our Auditors advised an effort to increase this pppl, and recommended a tax <br />increase if we intend to continue the current level o£ spending. <br />REVENUES <br />Revenues have been very close to estimates. The year's total Zn.tangible <br />and Beer and Wine Taxes have been received and both did not make it to 100, <br />There is a significant shortage in court related fees: officer fees in the <br />General Fund and fines and forfeitures in the Current Expens2.Fund. Delinquent <br />taxes and late list charges should exceed estimates, and if current trends con- <br />tinue building permits and register's fees will be up, both indicators of possible <br />economic upswing in the county. Sales taxes are very close to the line and very <br />dependent upon December collections far an adequate year, zn Social Services, <br />chore service revenues are npw included in State Aid to Administration which <br />explains the D.0~ in the former and 50.3 in the latter, Tne general level of <br />Social services revenues is tied directly to expenditures which to date have <br />been low, There is no loss to the county from decreased revenues for Social <br />Services since expenditures have been lower than anticipated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.