Orange County NC Website
' ~~~ <br />"WHEREAS, County governments in nearly half of the states <br />budget from July through June and all counties must make long <br />term budget commitments to efficiently meet the needs of their <br />citizens; <br />WHEREAS, Counties depend on general revenue sharing dollars <br />for essential county programs; <br />WHEREAS, Revenue sharing dollars enable counties to fill <br />locally d~ermined vital needs with minimal redtape and federal <br />restrictions; <br />WHEREAS, Efficient county government calls for well-planned <br />advance budgeting; <br />WHEREAS,. Responsive county government depends on efficient <br />county planning and budgeting and ample time for citizen <br />participation; <br />WHEREAS, The current revenue sharing program expires <br />December 31, 1976 and July through June fiscal year counties <br />must begin budgeting the previous spring; <br />THEREFORE, BE IT P~SOLVED BY the Orange County Board of <br />Commissioners, that general revenue sharing be re-enacted by <br />the first session of the 94th Congress providing counties with <br />advance dollar figures that can be used for efficient, respon- <br />sive planning of programs and budgets and that can be identified <br />for more than half of their fiscal '76 year and can be incorpor- <br />ated in long term effective planning. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution along <br />with the summary report be immediately forwarded to the Senate <br />and the House of Representatives." <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner <br />whitted,~ it was moved that the Board adopt the Revenue Sharing Resolu- <br />tion and the Clerk was requested to forward copy of the same to the <br />Congressional Delegation. <br />Discussion ensued concerning the Revenue Sharing Rally that has <br />been scheduled by NACO in Washington on November 18, 1975. <br />Chairman Garrett referred to Item #10 on the Agenda: A report <br />of progress toward locating an Animal Shelter. <br />Chairman Garrett stated that :she and Commissioner Pinney had <br />investigated the facility available at the Durham Boarding Kennel <br />and that they felt these facilities would provide the Board with a <br />solution to its animal problem. It was pointed out that the owner <br />would charge $100.00 per month plus 80 cents per dog and 60 cents <br />per cat which would amount to approximately $4,OD0.00 a year. <br />Discussion ensued concerning any requirements on the part of <br />the County to commit itself beyond a given period of time. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the County proceed to negotiate <br />a contract with the Durham Boarding Kennel for the housing of the <br />County's unwanted animals. <br />The County Administrator was requested to negotiate such a contract. <br />The Chairman referred to Item #15 on the Agenda and recognized <br />William Laws, Tax Supervisor. Mr. Laws referred the Board to the <br />Late-Listing Release Request of Mr. Francis Chan of Chapel Hill <br />Township, who had a late-list charge. Mr. Chan was present to appeal <br />- the late-list penalty for 1975. Mr. Chan stated that he was out of <br />the Country, getting married, and that his mail was not forwarded. <br />Upon his return to this Country he made an inquiry concerning his taxes <br />and was told that he could list them, however, due to the pressure of <br />other business he did not list the taxes until February $th. This was <br />four days beyond the late-list penalty date. He referred the Board to <br />the fact that it did not appear on the tax form the amount of the <br />penalty that would be imposed for late listing. <br />The Board inquired of the County Attorney as to what authority <br />they had to grant a release of the late tax listing penalty. <br />Mr. Coleman stated that without research, he could not advise them. <br />