Orange County NC Website
~1~ <br />Further discussion ensued concerning the matter. <br />Commissioner Whitted moved that the Board write to the Chairman <br />of the State Social Service Commission and request that in light of <br />the new ruling from the Attorney General's office that they allow <br />the County's appointee to the Board of Social Services to be seated <br />at the next Board meeting and a copy of the letter be sent to Clem <br />Johnson, Chairman of the Social Services Board. <br />Discussion ensued. Commissioner Whitted's motion died for lack <br />of a second. <br />Commissioner Whitted then moved that the proper form for the <br />appointment of Mae McLendon be returned to the State Social Services <br />Commission reaffirming the County's appointment to the Social Services <br />Board. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pinney. <br />The Chairman called for the vote. <br />Commissioners Garrett, Gustaveson, Pinney and ;Vhitted voted aye. <br />Commissioner Walker voted nay. <br />The motion was declared passed. <br />Commissioner Walker requested that the vote of the Board be made <br />a part of the letter that the Clerk would forward to the State Social <br />Service Commission. <br />E. Memorandum Concerning Child Support Enforcement Act <br />The County Attorney stated that he had not had an apportunity to <br />study the Memorandum of Understanding from the State Department of <br />Human Resources. The Memorandum deals with the Child Support Progx'am. <br />Mr. Coleman. stated that one of his Law Clerks attended an all day <br />conference on the matter and it was his understanding that the Federal -- <br />Government does not want to pay an attorney to be the agent to head i <br />up this work under this program. They think it is too expense and <br />they do not want the attorney to do the investigating. <br />IKr. Coleman stated that he had discussed the matter with an <br />Attorney from Johnston County. This county had instituted a similar <br />system several years ago and the Attorney advised him that the system <br />of having someone other than the County Attorney to do the investiga- <br />ting work with the County Attorney doing the prosecuting portion was <br />proving to be beneficial. He stated further that the County could <br />be reimbursed through the Federal Agency and that his office had not <br />received all the necessary data from the State. <br />Discussion ensued. The Board agreed to defer action on the matter. <br />The Chairman referred to Item #9 on the Agenda: The Summer <br />Recreation Program - The Recreation Director will report on the <br />activities of the recreation program during the past summer and <br />activities planned for the next few months. <br />Chairman Garrett recognized Wayne Weston, Recreation Director, <br />who reviewed the programs conducted through his department during <br />the summer months. <br />Discussion ensued concerning the need for a Recreation Advisory <br />and/or Steering Commission to back up and advise the Recreation Depart- <br />ment and members of the staff. <br />Commissioner Walker was not present for the afternoon session of <br />the meeting. <br />The Chairman referred to Item ~8 on the Agenda: Resolution <br />Endorsing Revenue Sharing - The State and National Association of <br />Counties have both requested their members to enact a resolution <br />endorsing the "Revenue Sharing" Program. <br />Chairman Garrett read the following resolution: <br />