Browse
Search
Minutes - 19751103
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1975
>
Minutes - 19751103
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2013 9:41:07 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/3/1975
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
111 <br />A. Noxthside School Property <br />A. B. Coleman, ,7r., County Attorney, advised the Board that he had <br />conferred with Ed Williams of the Division of Facility Service, Depart- <br />ment of Human Resources, concerning the p~'oposed Mental Health Grant <br />and Mr. Williams had advised him that his agency could not accept the <br />conditions that would have to be outlined in the Letter of Title. <br />"We discussed whether or not the property could be insured with title <br />insurance. Tt had been determined by the Facility Service Division <br />that title insurance would be acceptable if the title policy, in addi- <br />tion to insuring them and the County, would also contain certain pro- <br />visions that any law suit brought would be defended by the Title Insur- __ <br />ance Company. Lawyer's Title Insurance Company of North Carolina <br />wrote a letter to the Facility Division saying that they would insure <br />the property by title policy and in addition thereto would include the <br />defense of the title, if there were ever a law suit brought by anybody <br />in the chain of title." <br />Chairman Garrett inquired, "What are we to do now, Mr. Coleman?" <br />The County Attorney replied: "Mr. Williams has stated that this <br />is acceptable with them and that we can proceed. The Lawyer's Title <br />said they would insure the property upon certain conditions. These <br />conditions include a survey of the property and that the boundaries <br />be established by an agreement with the adjoining property owners." <br />Mr. Coleman stated that "a serious description problem did exist and <br />that after the survey all adjoining property owners must sign an agree- <br />ment establishing the boundaries to be cahere they are shown on the <br />survey. Mr. Coleman suggested that the Gounty secure a surveyor and <br />authorize him to consult with the adjoining property owners at the time <br />that the survey is being conducted in order to avoid any later dispute <br />over the boundary lines. <br />Commissioner L4hitted moved that the County proceed to have the <br />Northside School property surveyed and to authorize the surveyor to <br />consult with the adjoining property owners at the time of the survey <br />in order to establish the boundary lines. <br />The County Administrator inquired, "Will the Surveyor or the <br />Attorney have the authority .to negotiate and reach an agreement <br />independently without coming back to the Board for final authority?" <br />Commissioner Whitted replied, "Xes, that was the intent of the <br />motion." <br />Commissioner Gustaveson seconded the motion. <br />The Chairman called for the vote. <br />Commissioners Garrett, Gustaveson, Pinney and Whitted voted aye. <br />Commissioner Walker voted nay. <br />The motion was declared passed. <br />B. Grady Brown School Property <br />The County Attorney advised the Board that~by virtue of a deed <br />recorded in Book 259, page 38, in the Register of Deeds Office, the <br />County now owns the Grady A. Brown property subject to the following <br />conditions: - <br />"To Have and to Hold the above granted, bargained and described <br />premises, with the appurtenances, unto the said second party, - <br />and its successors and assigns, to its proper use, benefit and <br />behoof forever, upon the express condition that, in case the said <br />above described premises shall not be used by the second party for <br />a public purpose, or if said premises shall ever cease to be used <br />by the second party for a public purpose, then, and in such event, <br />the said parcel of land shall revert to the first party, as if <br />this conveyance had not been made." <br />Mr. Coleman explained to the Board the terminology of ,the pro- <br />vision in the heed to the Grady A. Brown property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.