Minutes - 19751006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

0 Mr. Coleman stated further that the Statutes require that a petition and/or petitions requiring a special school election must bear the approval of the Board of Education of which should be pre- sented before the Board of Commissioners and it shall be the duty of the Board of Commissioners to call an election and fix the date for the election and that the expense at holding and conducting the elec tion shall be provided by the Board of Education. Mr. Coleman stated that the Board of Commissioners had no discretionary authority in the matter if the Board of Education property petitioned for the calling of a special tax levy. The Board of Commissioners requested the County Attorney to advise the School Board of his findings relative to the matter of proper.peti° tioning for a Supplemental Tax Levy. Chairman Garrett referred to ltem #9 on the Agenda: Reports. p. Concerning Status of the Appointment of Ms. Mae McLendaon tc the County Board of Social Services. Steve Bernholz informed the Board that his staff was preparing a written Memorandum of Law that would be submitted to the Attorney General office and that he planned further to meet with the Attorney General in order that they might review the contents of the submitted documents cc~ wouldhbezforwardedhto each BoardeMember~ the Memorandum of Law, pY A. Northside School Property Mr. Coleman informed the Board that he had been in contact with Edward Williams of the Granting Agnecy of the Mental Health Division and that Mr. Williams had informed him the County would need a certifi- caticn of clear title in order foresented theedetails of themproblems • Orange County. Mr. Coleman then p he foresaw in clearing the title for the Northside School property. B. Grady A. Brown School Property Mr. Coleman stated that a question of where Hazel Street is located has posed somewhat of a problem in the clearing of title for the Grady A. Brown property, however, if the Board is willing to except a deed that would describe the property by the adjacent pro- . petty owners and accept the fact that at some future date the boundary line might be subject to change, then the transaction for this property could be completed. Discussion ensued. The Board agreed to accept the recommendation of the County Attorney on the matter. C. A possible Ordinance concerning development on lots of less than 40,000 square feet in size. The County Attorney stated that the Planning Department was in the process of gathering information on a proposed Ordinance. Discussion ensued concerning the need for the date and current authority of the local Health Department and other items that would and could affect the proposed Ordinance. Nc action was taken on this matter. E. Other matters - None. F. Personnel Study The County Administrator advised the Board that the State Personnel people were now working in Alamance County and stated that they would like to make a comparison between the Counties of Orange And Alamance. They are planning to come into Orange County shortly. Chairman Garrett referred to Item #11 on the Agenda: Facilities Study. On September 23rd the Board met with three consultants to consider proposals for facilities and/or management studies. Having heard these proposals what does the Board now desire to do?