Browse
Search
Minutes - 20090223
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Minutes - 20090223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 1:29:06 PM
Creation date
5/12/2009 1:03:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/23/2009
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-23-2009 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 02-23-2009
Agenda - 02-23-2009 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 02-23-2009
Agenda - 02-23-2009 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 02-23-2009
Agenda - 02-23-2009 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 02-23-2009
Agenda - 02-23-2009 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2009\Agenda - 02-23-2009
ORD-2009-014-Zoning Ordinance and Atlas Amendment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
ORD-2009-015-Proposed Amendments toArticle 2 Sections 2.2.14.3 through 2.2.14.9 of the Zoning Ordinance Clarifying the Procedures and Requirements for Amendments to the Adopted comprehensive Plan- 04-21-2009-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•The only references to the Comprehensive Plan are in regard to the Zoning Ordinance's <br /> consistency with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> Proposed Amendments to Article 2 - Intent <br /> •Establish clear and concise procedures and notification requirements for applications for <br /> amendments to the adopted Comprehensive Plan <br /> —Submittal requirements for Comprehensive Plan amendments <br /> —Notification requirements, including newspaper advertisements, mailed notices, and posting of <br /> the affected property <br /> —Processes, including, but not limited to; timing of notifications and public hearings; Planning <br /> Board, BOCC, and staff actions; and applicant options <br /> •Logical placement of specific procedures and requirements for Comprehensive Plan <br /> amendments within the Zoning Ordinance <br /> —Article 2 addresses the Comprehensive Plan, while Article 20 deals with Zoning Ordinance <br /> amendments only <br /> —Easier to follow and understand procedures and requirements; simplify <br /> Key Points <br /> •Procedures and requirements for Comprehensive Plan amendments clearly articulated in <br /> Article 2 <br /> — references to Article 20 removed <br /> •For County initiated amendments to the Land Use Plan (Map), a rezoning for the same <br /> property may be considered at the same public hearing <br /> Recommendation <br /> •Receive the proposed amendments to Article 2 <br /> •Conduct the public hearing to solicit and consider public input <br /> •Forward the item to the Planning Board for review and comment with a request a <br /> recommendation be submitted back to the BOCC in time for the April 21, 2009 meeting <br /> •Adjourn the public hearing until April 21, 2009 to receive the Planning Board recommendation <br /> and any written comments submitted <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz asked about the current cost for an application fee and Craig <br /> Benedict said that there is a base rate plus an acreage fee. The fee is $2,500 for a land use <br /> plan amendment. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz asked about an advisory board making a text amendment. Craig <br /> Benedict said that this would be approved by the County Commissioners. The fee would come <br /> into effect if it was not a County initiative. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz made reference to Section 2.2.14.6 and the submission of oral <br /> evidence to the Planning Board. He said that this makes the Planning Board meetings a <br /> second public hearing, and he does not think that this is wise. <br /> Craig Benedict said that this public would stay open until it is closed in April. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that he is concerned that the requirements of this prohibit <br /> reapplication for a one-year period after denial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.