Minutes - 20090223 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Rachel Phelps Hawkins arrived at 8:01 p.m. Commissioner Jacobs said that the notices were very difficult to understand. He asked for clarification on whether it would change anything about the additional notified properties beyond the affected property. Craig Benedict said no. Commissioner Yuhasz asked about the adoption of this ordinance. He said that qualified farms are exempt from zoning regulations under State statute. He noted on the proposed Part 1.5 that the farm exemption is supposedly not in effect with respect to this particular section of the zoning ordinance. He asked about the legal basis for exempting in Orange County certain parts of zoning from the bona fide farm exemption. Michael Harvey said that the Planning Department staff had the same concerns and the section was written based on the model of the Wake County Unified Development Ordinance after review with the County Attorney's Office. Commissioner Gordon said that the notice should have been clearer so that people would not have been forced to come out to the public hearing to get clarification. PUBLIC COMMENT: Lynette Hartsell spoke on behalf of the Friends of Lake Orange. She said that she asked for a copy of the letter from the Attorney General's Office that prompted this change. The letter is dated September 14, 2005, and is addressed to the National Flood Insurance Program. It was actually a memorandum. She said that the letter that she received addressed issues of FEMA, flood maps, and whether the maps can be incorporated. The issue addressed in the memorandum was whether or not future maps could be accepted without this kind of public notice. She said that she is confused that this is being moved under zoning. There is nothing in the letter that she read that you cannot have a standalone flood prevention ordinance. She said that the people in Lake Orange get nervous about these things. She said that the people in Lake Orange are concerned that their rights will be taken away from them. She said that there is a lot of distrust that the government will not act in the citizens' best interest. She said that there must be meaningful dialog and not just public hearings. She asked the County Commissioners to think outside the box and initiate a task force charged to identify problems and find solutions for Lake Orange and reach a binding agreement. Brent Clayton said that he bought 6.5 acres in 2000 and it was not in the floodplain. His property got put in a floodplain in 2007. He originally purchased his property behind the house that is there now. The floodplain took almost three acres of his property, and the property is now useless. He asked how this was helping him. Steve Richardson was with the Friends of Lake Orange. He said that there are vast gaps in the proposal and there are some State constitutionality questions. He urged the County Commissioners to decline to act on this unnecessary proposal. If the County Commissioners vote on this, he asked that they amend it specifically to honor and grandfather the special, perpetual, contractual rights with the County under the terms by which Lake Orange was gifted to the County 40 years ago, so that nothing within the technical zoning change can be construed as going against those rights in any way. Secondly, the property owners of Lake Orange have endured decades of bad experience with the County and are mistrustful. Several County Commissioners and staff have been welcoming, forthcoming, and have worked in good faith. He thanked those people. He said that these people were the exception. He said that the assurance that this change would have no effect on properties is not strictly true. He read a resolution that was proposed by the Friends of Lake Orange, as follows: "In the interest of reestablishing mutual trust and good will, eliminating future avoidable misunderstandings that could further divert all involved from their other interests, responsibilities, and duties, as well as potential future involvement of remote third parties whose