Browse
Search
Minutes - 19750811
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1975
>
Minutes - 19750811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2013 4:36:02 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:13:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/11/1975
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br />this ~rogr.am. for each unit placed .in service 'ritJJ will make a <br />one time allocation of $275. Annually thereafter, {.:hey vain allow <br />8.S$ of the two bedroom non elevator rent as an administrative expense. <br />In the :.ase of Orange County with an initial allocation of sixty-six <br />units the administrative allocation would be .roughly :7,500 per year. <br />Mr. Sarver felt it would be most practical if the units from <br />Orange County could agree among themselves who would operate the <br />program and allocate all the administrative funds to this agency.' <br />This concluded Mr. 5arver's presentation. Alderman Srtith asked <br />- Pdr. Sarver if it were possible to approach HUD and ask for an increase <br />in the number of allocated units. Mr. Sarver responded by saying HUD <br />had advised him no additional units would be allocated at this time. <br />Commissioner Norman Gustaveson asked Mr. Sarver what his estimate <br />of the staff requirements to make *_his program successful might be? <br />Mr. Sarver replied he felt three persons would be an appropriate number. <br />One to deal with tenants, one to deal with properties and one overall <br />coordinator. <br />rqr, R, D, Smith inctrireu about the disposition of any <br />unallocatec units in Orange or any other County. T.4r. Sarver replie.3 <br />that they would be reallocated to units needing them. <br />CZair:T~an Garrett brought up the question of haw we should proceed <br />at this paint. ~30~,+ shall we decide who will ~e the FF3F? Shall we work <br />together or separately? <br />Alderman Chamblee from Carrboro stated he would like to see a <br />joint effort. A co-anty-wiee unit might be created to operate the <br />pro3rarn t~a.t pia:: some prearranged patterr. of distributing units tlzrough- <br />out the County. <br />Alderrman R. '.7. Smith from Cha~~el ii11 suggested the Chape_ Hi 11 <br />.ReQevelopment Co~~~nission be named the FHA. <br />Commissioner IQox=ran Gustaveson inquired about the possibility of <br />- a County PHA being .created that contracted the administrative function <br />to the Chapel Hill Housing Authority. <br />:rCurt Jenne stated that Chapel Hill had for a long time considered <br />Section Eight housing as a tool they could use to help eliminate sub- <br />stan~aarcl houses an~3 ±herefore felt tae necessity of exercising some <br />control over the Section Eight program as it is operated <<+i thin the <br />town limits. <br />It was then suggested •the County assuln~ the role of the housing <br />authority and tha•c. ar_ advisory group of representatives from the Ca::n•~y, <br />Carrboro, Chapel Hill and Hillsborough serve as the policy malting age~.t. <br />The administrative function could L4 contracted out to the Chapel Till <br />Housing Authority or some other agency. <br />Commissioner Norman Walker then brought up the question of r~hether <br />or not the County should proceed with a Section Eight housing. program? <br />I.3e asked ±•he questions, Is there a need for this program? j9i11 people <br />actually aptly fur section Eight snits? <br />Commissioner Richard Whitted responded by saying he was aware of <br />several cases in wl.tich landlords had the desire to i.mpYove housing units <br />but because of a lack of sufficient rents wex'e unwilling to proceed. <br />The Section Eight program would help eliminate this conrlitian. <br />Commissioner Normar_ Gustaveson then movec'_ L-he County support filing <br />a Section ,sight al~Llication. <br />Conmtissioner walker suggestec' this matter be delayed until Commis- <br />sioner Jan Pinney returns from vacation and the full }]oard wrnalc~ k~e on <br />hand to inalce this decision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.