Browse
Search
Minutes - 19750724
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1975
>
Minutes - 19750724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2013 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/24/1975
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i'~ <br />MTPdJTES <br />BOARD OF EQUALIZATION A"7D REVIEW <br />July 24, 1975 <br />The 1975 Orange County Board of Equalization and Review met on <br />Thursday, July 24, 1975, at 7;00 p.m., in the Commissioners' Room in <br />the Orange County Courthouse. <br />County Commissioners present were Chairman Flora Garrett, Norman <br />Gustaveson, ~7an Pinney, Richard E. F~hitted. <br />Commissioner Norman Walker did not arrive at this meeting until <br />the Tax Supervisor was making the presentation on the Duke University <br />property. <br />Also present were Tlilliam Laws, Tax Supervisor; T3etty June Hayes, <br />Clerk to the Board; S. M. Gattis, County *~Ianager and Neal. r,vans, <br />Fiscal officer. <br />The Tax Supervisor advised the Board treat the appeals of George <br />Tate, May Car*nichael, Jefferson Rainey, and Shepherd D. Storey needed <br />to be reviewed. Tt was agreed that the Board would hear these appeals <br />on the third Tuesday in August. <br />P4r. Laces advised the Board that these were eight requests for refunds. <br />Richasd N. Bateman had previously appealed the evaluation placed on <br />his home. The Board had in previous action reduced the evaluation from <br />$30,000 to $17,000 far the year of 1974. Mr. Bateman was requesting a <br />refund for 1973 in that he paid his taxes an a $30,000 evaluation. It <br />was pointed out that part of this problem occurred due to the fact that <br />~'. Bateman would not allow the Tax Assessor to enter upon his property <br />and he did not file a request for the refund or hearing in the tax year <br />of 1973. <br />Further discussion ensued. <br />Upon the motion of Commissioner T~7hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Pinney, it was moved and adopted that the request for refund for the <br />year 1973 be denied to Richard N. Bateman. <br />E. L. Council of Brewer Lane, Chapel FTill had paid his 1974 taxes <br />based on an evaluation that was subseGuently reduced by the Board. <br />Mr. Council owns two pa?^cel~ of land on Brewer Land and was re- <br />questing a refund in the amount of $15.39 for each parcel, making a <br />total refund of $30.78. - <br />Upon the motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner <br />Whetted, it was moved and adopted that the 1974 tax refund be granted <br />to E. L. Council. <br />William Hall of Hillsborough was requesting a tax refund of $15.36 <br />for the years 1973 and 1974. A second house had been attached to his <br />appraisal card when.in fact only one house existed on the property. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Whetted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the tax refund for the <br />years 1973 and 19.74 be made to A7illiam Hall. <br />Susie Weaver of Chapel Hill had been taxed with a double lot <br />listing. There was but one lot, however, an additional lot of 50 <br />feet had been mapped and changed to her account since 1970. Mr. Laws <br />advised the Board that tax refunds could only cover a three year period. <br />and that Mrs. Weaver was requesting that a refund in the amount of 535.18 <br />be made for the years 1971 and 1972. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.