Browse
Search
Minutes - 19750618
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1970's
>
1975
>
Minutes - 19750618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 12:39:25 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:13:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/1975
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~, <br />Commissioner Walker replied that he felt this item must be continued as the <br />future water supply of the County would depend on an adequate water supply. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he would like to go on record as saying <br />he was not able to see how the County can entertain a sixty cents (60 G) tax rate <br />based upon the Budget requests. <br />Commissioner Pinney stated he slid not see how we could fund the three hundred <br />thousand dollars ($300,OOD) to the Orange County School Unit on a sixty cents (60G) <br />tax rate. <br />Commissioner *rrizitted stated that he agreed with the premise and that he would <br />strongly urge the Board to consider planning a tax rate that could be maintained over _ <br />a three (3) or four (4) year period. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he was in favor of a sixty cents (fi0G) tax rate <br />as it could be explained to him how to maintain the current level of service. <br />Commissioner Whitted stated that if the Board would consider using the Building <br />Fund and the Seven-Mile Creek Reservoir Funds then the County could retain the sixty <br />cents (60C).tax rate. <br />Chairman Garrett requested the Board to talk again about the cash flow situation. <br />She said, "There are a lot of different ways we can handle the cash flow if you go <br />back over the Budget, this year and next year. There are ways you can change cash flows <br />through regular payments by the various agencies to get the tax." <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated, "I move, now seriously, I think we could give a <br />number of things on what we have already planned and in the works but we could plan a <br />very meaningful Bridget with a ten cents (lOG) tax increase this year. St would pro- <br />vide us with, I think the kind of program objectives that we could live with. I agree <br />completely with Richard in that next year is going to be a very, very tough year even <br />with sixty-five (65G). It is going to mean more next year and it may be that we can <br />do it this year and let next year go with no taxes." . <br />Chairman Garrett inquired,"that is a motion? Is there a second to this motion?" <br />The Chairman then declared, "That motion has died for the lack of a second." <br />Chairman Garrett stated that she felt the Board needed to develop a planning Budget <br />for next year as there were many things in this year's Budget that she was not happy __ <br />about. <br />It was agreed that the Board would start with the School Current Expense Fund. <br />Commissioner [calker moved that the Board adopt the County Manager's recommendation <br />as a compromising figure, and seta tax rate of sixty-five cents (65G) per one hundred <br />dollar'($100) valuation. This motion died for the lack of a second. <br />Commissioner Pinney moved that the per capita be set at two hundred and twenty- <br />five dollars ($225) per student exclusive of ESA money and that the County School System <br />be allocated one hundred ninety-three thousand, two hundred and seventy-five dollars <br />($193,275.) and that the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School System be allocated one hundred <br />sixteen thousand, four hundred and eighty-five dollars ($116,485.) and that in capital <br />outlay the thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.) that had been cut out be placed back in <br />and that it lie divided equally between the two School Systems amounting to six hundred <br />thirty-two thousand dollars ($632,000.) each in the Capital Outla}• Fund. <br />Commissioner Gustaveson stated that he worried about the paper contract outlay for <br />the Cultural Arts Building. <br />Commissioner Pinney withdrew his motion and stated that .he would make the .following <br />concensus statement. .The per. capital shoirld:be set at two hundred and twenty-five dollars <br />($225.) per student exclusive of the ESA money and the County School System be allocated <br />one hundred ninety-three thousand, two hundred and seventy-five dollars ($193,275.) and <br />that the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School System be allocated one hundred sixteen thousand, <br />four hundred and eighty-five ($116,485.) dollars and that in capital outlay the thirty <br />thousand ($30,000.) dollars that had been cut out be placed back in and that it be divided <br />equally between the two School System amounting to six hundred thirty-two thousand <br />($632,000.) dollars each in the Capital Outlay Fund and that the Board agree to grant <br />the Chapel Hill-•Carrboro School Unit a paper contract for the Cultural Arta Center. <br />Commissioner •.4alker stated that if Commissioner Pinney would change his concensus <br />statement to a motion, he would second the same. ,. <br />The Clerk read the motion to Commissioner [4alker. He stated that he would not <br />second the motion if the portion referring to the paper contract was left in. <br />Mary Scroggs, Chairman of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Board, stated that <br />no total figures were available as to the cost of the proposed Cultural Arts Center, <br />therefore, the Board cannot agree to suo_h a contract until the cost of construction <br />had been determined. <br />x; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.