Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2009 - 4q
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 05-05-2009
>
Agenda - 05-05-2009 - 4q
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2009 1:28:13 PM
Creation date
5/1/2009 1:28:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4q
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090505
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
RES-2009-035 Resolution Opposing House Bill 1252 and Senate Bill 1004
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />-----Forwarded Message---- <br />From: Renee Boyette <br />Sent: Apr 27, 2009 12:51 PM <br />To: Region J Managers , Region J Assistant Managers ,Board of Delegates ,Alternate Delegates <br />Subject: Anti-MUNI BEND Bill - TJCOG Call to Action? <br />Hi all, <br />Kirby asked me to forward this request. <br />Thanks, <br />Renee <br />Please consider adopting the attached NCLM resolution in opposition to the S61004 and H61252 -the <br />"Anti-Muni Broadband Bills". After adoption, send a copy of the resolution to the House Public Utility <br />Committee members (list attached) as well as to your local legislative delegation. The PU Committee <br />members need to hear from the local communities as the cable industry has a has a lot of folks in Raleigh <br />on this right now. <br />From Action Audits---Wednesday's Committee Action update <br />The House and Science Committee voted on H1252, the so-called "The Level Playing Field" bill today, but <br />reported it out, not with a favorable report, but to the Public Utilities Committee and "without prejudice," <br />which apparently is code for the legislators that this is a bill very much in trouble. This is a small victory, but <br />our battle continues, now in the Public Utilities Committee. <br />Perhaps this will be a day remembered again for when North Carolina refused to be a captive of Time <br />Wamer Cable. Time Warner Cable demonstrated it was the obvious sponsor of H1252 when the Committee <br />Chair (and bill's legislative sponsor) was asked various questions by Committee members, and asked Time <br />Warner Cable's Director of Government Affairs, Brad Phillips, and outside attorney, Marc Trathen, to the <br />podium to answer what the bill meant. Stirring that debate was Rep. Haire (D-Haywood, Jackson, Mason, <br />Swaine) a particular champion of the people, who successfully obtained the elimination of injunctive relief <br />language which one of the Committee members argued created a presumption favoring TWC if it chose to <br />sue a community for providing bbnd, with Rep. Dan Blue (D-Wake) and Rep Jones (D-Guilford) asking good <br />questions at Haire's side. While this discusssion was going on, one of the bill's sponsors Thom Tillis (R- <br />Mecklenburg) was passed a note by Time Warner Cable's Brad Phillips. Tillis raised his hand and told the <br />Committee Chair he had no problem with the amendment and it passed on voice vote. <br />As part of the bill's presentation, the crowd learned that changes had been made to the original version of <br />the bill by the bill's sponsor, one allegedly removing any threat on the use of federal grant money to <br />build municipal systems, and the other allegedly grandfathering existing systems. Neither change does that <br />in reality. The emotional tenor of the meeting was raised in fact when Mr. Phillips, who described <br />these changes, then characterized them as having been approved by the cities, naming Mi-CONNECTION <br />and Salisbury specifically. But the individual Cities had not met with the industry, nor approved any such <br />changes. <br />Directly before the final vote, NCLM's representative, Kelli Kukura, spoke in powerful and direct opposition to <br />the bill and deferred the remainder of her time to the Mayors of Salisbury and Wilson, the former who <br />clarified they had not approved any changes to the bill, and the latter who made an impassioned plea that <br />this bill was nothing other than an "incumbents" bill and a series of burdens on municipalities who dared to <br />bring the level of bbnd infrastructure to their residents that will keep them globally competitive. Alcatel- <br />Lucent, through Kevin Krufsky, then came to the podium and provided an elegant and pressured argument <br />about why the bill was bad for North Carolina's economic development and would create anything BUT a <br />level playing field, but would have the effect of denying North Carolina access to next generation broadband <br />systems. The Bill's sponsor, Ty Harrell, then acted on Rep. Tillis' motion to report the bill out favorably to the <br />Utility Committee; Rep. Haire interrrupted and made a substitute motion that the bill be reported out to the <br />Public Utility Committee without prejudice. Ty Harrell objected saying it should be reported out favorably. A <br />vote was taken on Haire's motion of voice vote, and Rep. Tolson called the vote in favor of Haire's substitute <br />amendment, that it report out without prejudice. <br />Next Steps: A list of Public Utility Committee members is attached. Bill sponsors on the Committee are <br />noted in red. Cities, towns and counties are strongly encouraged to adopt the NCLM resolution and send it <br />to their representatives and to Committee members, to make it clear to legislators on the Public Utility <br />committee that this is a bill that will only harm North Carolina's future. There is nothing "level" about it. It is <br />merely the act by a $17.2 billion/year cable company to stop local NC communities from building their own <br />broadband infrastructures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.