Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2009 - 4m
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Agenda - 05-05-2009
>
Agenda - 05-05-2009 - 4m
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 11:13:52 AM
Creation date
5/1/2009 1:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2009
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4m
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20090505
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section II <br />1. <br />0) <br />3. <br />C. Student Projections <br />Responsible Entity for Suggesting Change — The updating of this section will be <br />conducted by the Planning Directors, School Representatives, Technical Advisory <br />Committee (SAPFOTAC) and referred to the BOCC for annual report certifications. <br />Projections will be distributed to SAPFO partners for review and comments to the BOCC <br />prior to certification. <br />Definition — The result of the average of the five student projection models represented <br />by 10 year numerical membership projections by school level (Elementary, Middle, and <br />High) for each school district (Chapel Hill/Carrboro School District and Orange County <br />School District). <br />Standard for: <br />Chapel Hill Carrboro School District <br />Standard for: <br />Orange County School District <br />The 5 model average discussed in Section 113 The 5 model average discussed in Section II.B <br />(Student Projection Methodology) <br />See Attachment II.C.4 <br />4. Analysis of Existing Conditions <br />(Student Projection Methodology) <br />See Attachment II.C.3 <br />The membership figures and percentage growth on the attachments show continued <br />growth in both systems. Variability by school level and between the School Districts is <br />also noted. Year -by -year percent growth is shown on the attached table as well as the <br />projected LOS. The projections models were updated using current (November 15) <br />memberships. Ten years of student membership were projected thereafter. <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.