Orange County NC Website
Chairman Garrett declared the motion passed. <br /> Chairman Garrett referred to Item #5 on the Agenda: (The term of Mrs. Vivian <br /> Edmonds on the Social Services Board has expired) . <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that Item #5 was in error in that Vivian Edmonds <br /> was a State appointee to the Social Service Board and that it was William Breeze's <br /> term that was expiring in June. Mr. Breeze was appointed to fill the unexpired <br /> term of Jean McDade. <br /> Discussion ensued. <br /> i <br /> Commissioner Walker moved that the Board reappoint Mr. Breeze as a member of <br /> the Social Service Board. This motion died for lack of a second. <br /> Action was deferred on the motion until the June 17th meeting. <br /> The Clerk was instructedcto call Roger Foushee relative to the Orange County <br /> Bicentennial Committee. <br /> The Board was informed that the Northside School property title was being <br /> checked. However, a defect in a portion of the title had been found. Therefore, <br /> the status of the property title was yet to be determined. <br /> Commissioner Gustaveson brought to the attention of the Board House Bills 473 <br /> and 254. He referred to Legislative Bulletin #18, dated May 29, 1975, which states <br /> "Inventory taxes would be cut in half over a five year period by Committee Substitute <br /> for H 473, which passed House Finance by 25 to 19 and will be on the House Calendar <br /> Tuesday, June 3rd. First year loss is $8.3 million and fifth year loss is estimated <br /> at $50 million. The original H 473 provided for continued payment of inventory taxes <br /> to local governments with a credit against state income tax. The Committee Substi- <br /> tute has no such provision. The entire loss will be borne by Local Governments." <br /> Regarding House Bill 254 it was stated that "Another $20 million loss would <br /> be inflicted by Committee Substitute for H 254. This bill now includes liberaliza- <br /> tion for the aged and disabled exemptions; improved taxation of mobile homes; and <br /> exemption of household and kitchen personal property. This bill passed second read- <br /> ing on Friday by a very substantial margin. County Commissioners are facing the <br /> same budget problems as the General Assembly and this is no time for reduction of <br /> local tax revenues or erosion of the local tax base. 11 <br /> Upon the motion of Commissioner Pinney it was moved and adopted that the <br /> Board go on record as being in opposition to House Bills 473 and 254. <br /> House Bill 1171 dealt with the Health Planning Council. Upon motion of <br /> Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, it was moved and adopted <br /> that a letter of support be forwarded to the Orange County delegation in the <br /> General Assembly with a copy directed to Rep. Claude DeBruhl. <br /> There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was <br /> adjourned. <br /> Flora Garrett, Chairman <br /> Betty June Hayes, Clerk <br /> MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF C014MISSIO14ERS <br /> JUNE 3, 1975 <br /> The Orange County Board of Commissioners met in the Commissioners Room of the <br /> County Courthouse in Hillsborough at 7:30 p.m. , on Tuesday, June 3, 1975. <br /> Members present were Flora Garrett, Norm Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker, <br /> and Richard E. Whitted. <br /> r <br /> Members absent: None. <br /> This meeting was held to discuss the proposed 1975-1976 County Budget. <br /> I <br /> The Chairman called upon Mrs. Mary Scroggs, Chairman of the Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro City School Board, to present the budget proposal of the Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro City Schools. <br /> Mrs. Scroggs made a few introductory remarks and turned the budget presenta- <br /> tion over to Dr. Hanes, the units Superintendent. <br /> Dr. Hanes opened his presentation by saying the schools are presently being <br /> severely hurt by inflation and the withdrawal of both state and federal funds. <br /> They anticipate losing about $35,000.00 in actual state funds next year. Instead <br /> of an actual gain of teacher allotment anticipated next year they are faced with a <br />